Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: "Mike Easter" <MikeE@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:15:58 -0800
Shmuel
"Mike Easter"
If you are already familiar with all of the groups which are
potential groups for you to post, then you should post to the one
which you already know would be the best.
Often there is no such group. Consider a question about
implementations of a specific language on a specific operating
system, or a question involving both hardware and software aspects.
Let's don't talk in nebulous concepts. Give me the MID of the last
message which you created and crossposted and I'll see if I can give an
opinion about how it should have been properly posted to a single group.
--
Mike Easter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- References:
- Cross posting
- From: Rosie
- Dialog, was Cross posting
- From: XS11E
- Re: Dialog, was Cross posting
- From: Ohmster
- Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Daniel James
- Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Mike Easter
- Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Daniel James
- Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Mike Easter
- Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Ohmster
- Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Mike Easter
- Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Seymour J.
- Cross posting
- Prev by Date: Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- Next by Date: Re: Xnews 2006/08/24 - Some functions that seemed obvious, don't behave as such
- Previous by thread: Re: Abuse of follow-up
- Next by thread: Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- Index(es):