Re: Abuse of follow-up
- From: Daniel James <wastebasket@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:57:26 GMT
In article news:<13jc75j4p3rv60d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Easter wrote:
Just because any particular individual message might apply to a number
of different groups doesn't mean that it should be posted to all of
them.
As a general rule, a message should be posted to the one best group.
That's all true ... and is a good reason for the OP to limit his posting
to one group, or a (very) small number of groups.
One a message has been crossposted, though -- and thoughtful crossposting
is not always wrong -- it does more harm than good to set a followup.
The business of posting a dumb question expressed badly into several
groups which the poster has never even visited is the stupidest thing I
have ever heard of.
Nobody here is suggesting otherwise. That's not what this subthread is
about.
--
Cheers,
Daniel.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Abuse of follow-up
- From: Mike Easter
- Re: Abuse of follow-up
- References:
- Cross posting
- From: Rosie
- Dialog, was Cross posting
- From: XS11E
- Re: Dialog, was Cross posting
- From: Ohmster
- Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Daniel James
- Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- From: Mike Easter
- Re: Abuse of follow-up
- From: Tarkus
- Re: Abuse of follow-up
- From: Mike Easter
- Cross posting
- Prev by Date: Re: Abuse of follow-up (was: Dialog, was Cross posting)
- Next by Date: Re: Abuse of follow-up
- Previous by thread: Re: Abuse of follow-up
- Next by thread: Re: Abuse of follow-up
- Index(es):