Re: [pan] ping Blinky: a case of strange MID headers

From: Mike Dee <mikedee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Aug 2007 10:52:04 +1100

"Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It violates a SHOULD rather than a MUST.

"Violates" is a bit too strong a description. "Doesn't follow a
suggested convention" is more appropriate. Its the servers and clients
that allow it to pass that are following the "MUST" suggestion.

--
dee
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pan] ping Blinky: a case of strange MID headers
  - From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

References:
- Re: [pan] ping Blinky: a case of strange MID headers
  - From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
- Re: [pan] ping Blinky: a case of strange MID headers
  - From: Mike Dee
- Re: [pan] ping Blinky: a case of strange MID headers
  - From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

Prev by Date: Re: [slrn] reading manuals from within slrn macro
Next by Date: Re: [slrn] How to display ALL articles in a thread, even the read ones ?
Previous by thread: Re: [pan] ping Blinky: a case of strange MID headers
Next by thread: Re: [pan] ping Blinky: a case of strange MID headers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread