Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: Top <topretired@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jul 2007 13:54:38 GMT
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:17:42 -0600, Incognito wrote:
The filter is a solution to the problem that the individual reader
thereby solved.
Well, if the reader abhors being confronted with opinions of individuals
who understandably see no necessity of revealing their incognito in the
course of Internet discussions, then, indeed, a remailer filter is a
solution. Who cares?
Having an X-No-Archive header does nothing more to keep a quote of OP
out of an archive than my X-No-Bananas header.
Correct.
So says you, yeah right
.
- References:
- Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: -Lost
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: Blinky the Shark
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: Nomen Nescio
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: Mike Easter
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: Cyberiade . it Anonymous Remailer
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: Mike Yetto
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: Incognito
- Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- Prev by Date: USENET archive(s) other than Google?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: deciphering Google header information
- Previous by thread: Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- Next by thread: Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
