Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: XS11E <xs11e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:00:06 -0700
MartinS <me@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
XS11E <xs11e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
»Q« <boxcars@xxxxxxx> wrote:
William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think Google sucks.
He doesn't seem to think that there are *other* newsgroup
archiving services which *don't* honour the XNA header.
Maybe they don't suck as badly as Google.
Google doesn't suck badly, Google sucks really well! It's what
they're best at....
Like Hoover?
Do you mean Hoover the dam or Hoover my friends dog or Hoover the
president or Hoover the vacuum?
The dam doesn't suck, it's pretty impressive, the dog is a really neat
dog, the president is dead and doesn't do much of anything any more and
the vacuum either sucks or gets scrapped.
Hard to see the comparison, Google sucks and people keep using it for
some reason? ;-)
NOTE: I use Google all the time, it's very handy and I have no trouble
searching newsgroups with it, even the new Google but as a newsreader
and posting agent it sucks.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
.
- References:
- Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: -Lost
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: Blinky the Shark
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: William Poaster
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: XS11E
- Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- From: MartinS
- Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- Next by Date: Re: Posting Through Deja
- Previous by thread: Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- Next by thread: Re: Why do people use X-No-Archive?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|