Re: dumb question...
- From: Frank Slootweg <this@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Aug 2006 19:09:34 GMT
Brian <this@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Frank Slootweg wrote:
Brian <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[deleted]
Also, what do you mean by domain abuse? I really didn't think I had to
use my REAL address.
[deleted]
What you can do is use a fake address and add ".invalid" at the end.
See for example my (non) address. ".invalid" is a (RFC) *standard* [1]
TLD (Top Level Domain) which is guaranteed to never exist, so basically
you can use <anything>@<anything>.invalid and you'll be OK. The added
advantage of using ".invalid" is that ".invalid"-aware mailers (MUAs)
will not even *try* to send mail to such (non) addresses.
[deleted]
Sweet, I didn't know about the domain stuff. Hope you don't mind, I am
now using your "invalid address". Is that okay?
Well, yes and 'no'. Yes, because if I remember correctly, I also
'borrowed' it from someone else. 'No', because for some searches in (for
example) Google Groups, it will look if everybody with the same
'address' is the same poster. I.e. I would *prefer* it if you could use
something which is (ever so slightly) different. But ... it's a free
world, so ...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dumb question...
- From: Brian
- Re: dumb question...
- References:
- dumb question...
- From: Brian
- Re: dumb question...
- From: Jayne Kulikauskas
- Re: dumb question...
- From: Frank Slootweg
- Re: dumb question...
- From: Brian
- Re: dumb question...
- From: Frank Slootweg
- Re: dumb question...
- From: Brian
- dumb question...
- Prev by Date: Re: Writing a guide for Google users switching to newsreaders
- Next by Date: Re: Writing a guide for Google users switching to newsreaders
- Previous by thread: Re: dumb question...
- Next by thread: Re: dumb question...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading