Re: That dirty Frank

Robert Singers <rsingers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Between saving the world and having a spot of tea Frank Slootweg said
[snip]
So if your "*specific* group of people" means the people who post in
some specific group(s)/hierarchy, then yes, I *said* so.

But if it means a specific *subset* of that group of people, then
you're wrong.

You're making an assumption that you can't back up because you're such a
desperately small man that you have to be right and I have to be wrong.

And you, supposedly, *can* back up your claim, but you *didn't*, and
that mysteriously makes me wrong and you right. Got it! Makes perfect
sense.

It's all very tedious.

At least we agree on *something*.

And Frank, get over your little thing about snipping. You may be vain
enough to think that everything you type should be reproduced, but
really very little of it is either germane or worth replying to.

[another childish red herring deleted]

Look, it's really rather simple: If you, apparently, can't handle
getting caught, then don't cheat.

In this case it was not 'just' cheating, but outright lying.

You may think that you can, but you're not fooling anybody in the
audience. Not the previous umpteenth times, and not this time.

So at least have the decency to honor my (snipped) request:

[restored:]

In any case, please quit playing your stupid little games.

[deleted]

If you're unable or unwilling to do that (I suspect the former),
then at least have the decency to leave me out of it, i.e. do not
post/respond to/about me.
.

Relevant Pages
Loading