Re: [Dialog] Filtering the nonsense

saur said:

Eggs Zachtly <re@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

saur said:

This may be old news to the regulars here, but the following scoring rules
eliminate 99% of the garbage I don't want to see.

I highly doubt the percentage would be that high, using only the four rules
below.

Reread what you quoted.

No need. I read it correctly the first time.

It does eliminate 99% of what I don't want to see.
I didn't say 99% of what you don't want to see.

So, you're "ok" with the *rest* of the garbage, then. As you weren't clear
on what was/wasn't garbage, and your four "super-rules" cover 99% of what
you perceive to be garbage, that would mean *most* of the posts here
(including replies to your "fab four", those crossposts to other kook/troll
froups, and EVERYTHING/everyONE else posted/ing (save 1%)), is/are "not
garbage". Perhaps you should have titled the thread "Filtering my
nonsense", rather than "Filtering THE nonsense".

I'm just saying that your rules could be more efficient, and cover MUCH
more of the "nonsense" , by being less specific, that's all.

I made the statement you quoted here, and qualified my reason for my
statement, ended my post with the statement that it was something for yout
to think about, as well as with a smiley, all of which you conveniently
snipped.

--
Eggs

-Age is a very high price to pay for maturity.
.

Relevant Pages