Re: [OT] [whine] Please remove "was ..." when responding.
- From: Peter J Ross <pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 22:04:15 +0000
On 03 Mar 2006 21:21:56 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in news.software.readers:
Peter J Ross <pjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<...>
tin has this, out of the box :-), :
# A regular expression that tin will use to find Subject suffixes
# which will be removed when replying or posting followup.
strip_was_regex=.\(([Ww]a[rs]|[Bb]y[l³]o):.*\)\s*$
That first "." puzzles me.
slrn regexes aren't case-sensitive by default, so there's no need for [Ww].
If I read German newsgroups I'd certainly use "wa[sr]".
"|" doesn't work at all in s-lang. :-(
I don't even know what language the part beginning with B is.
Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
My turn to whine: why did you mark a post that's partly about
newsreader configuration "OT"? ;-)
Yeah, I thought of that, but what is the marker for *partly* OT? :-)
[POT], of course!
Also, it's only a newsreader configuration issue for those few of us
with *real* newsreaders.
The "few" may be in the majority here.
For the vast majority of mere mortals, it's a
*netiquette* issue! :-)
And Blinky is the egregious violater of netiquette in this case,
having got the whole "was..." thing completely wrong. :-)
PJR :-)
--
Have you been touched ___ ___ Hammer of Thor, Jan 2006
by His noodly / _ \ / _ \
appendage? ( (_) )( (_) ) Pierre Salinger Memorial
\_ _/ \_ _/ Hook, Line & Sinker, Dec
STOP GLOBAL __ _.-\\----//--._ 2003 & May 2005
WARMING _ / _\___.-'/ _| / _\ /\/\`-._.-.__ _
NOW, (_\_)| \___ ||_ ((_ //\/\\ _.-._ \-' ) AHM Wittiest
JIM LAD! \__) __) | _| _) ) || || (_ \_.-' Troll of the
/_-. || \_/ || .-'-.\ Year, 2003
http:// _._// / .--._______.-'\ \ \\__._ 2004 & 2005
www. /_._/ \ \ )) \__._)
venganza (/ _.-') ( `-._ wsd 42 ~ mhm 34x8
..org/ (_.-' :F_P: `--._) smeeter 30 ~ mwpl 12
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] [whine] Please remove "was ..." when responding.
- From: Blinky the Shark
- Re: [OT] [whine] Please remove "was ..." when responding.
- References:
- [Dialog] Killing Google posts.
- From: Eggs Zachtly
- Re: [Dialog] Killing Google posts.
- From: Blinky the Shark
- Re: [Dialog] Killing Google posts.
- From: Top
- Re: [Dialog] Killing Google posts.
- From: Blinky the Shark
- Re: [Dialog] Killing Google posts.
- From: Top
- Re: [Dialog] Killing Google posts.
- From: Top
- Google Rules For Various Clients [was Re: [Dialog] Killing Google posts.]
- From: Blinky the Shark
- Re: Google Rules For Various Clients [was Re: [Dialog] Killing Google posts.]
- From: Tagger
- [OT] [whine] Please remove "was ..." when responding.
- From: Frank Slootweg
- Re: [OT] [whine] Please remove "was ..." when responding.
- From: Peter J Ross
- Re: [OT] [whine] Please remove "was ..." when responding.
- From: Frank Slootweg
- [Dialog] Killing Google posts.
- Prev by Date: Re: Test -please ignore
- Next by Date: Re: Google Rules For Various Clients
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] [whine] Please remove "was ..." when responding.
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] [whine] Please remove "was ..." when responding.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|