Re: OT SPAM

»Q« <boxcars@xxxxxxx> wrote in
news:MrQ973A86D603AD2itsmeitsQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

"Marc L." <master.cougar+news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:Xns973A44A1DB7Cmastercougarhotmailc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Mike Dee <mikedee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:Xns973AB4D9A7578emteedee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Sorry bud, but I wouldn't've seen this post had you not:

(a) responded to it
(b) quoted it in your reply.

Guess you have trouble reading for comprehension. I posted so
that someone who knows HOW could help get this *** off usenet.
Kind of hard if you don't include the details.

People are not having trouble understanding you. We know why you
thought it was a good idea to repost the spammer's URL. Why you
continue to think it a good idea does raise reading comprehension
questions, though. If you actually want to learn what ideas are good
and bad, check the references Frank gave. Otherwise, please stop
trying to be helpful.

This ng is sounding better and better; smug condescension ie;

The trait of displaying arrogance by patronizing those considered
inferior< if you read a prior post;

Marc isn't the sharpest knife in the block. I'm sure you're going to
find conversing with him much like feeding atroll.

it doesn't seem to be 'Marc' who began to;

converse offensively when you use ad hominem attacks instead
focusing on the issue of your response to the spam.

Possibly this group is comprised of people who spend so much time in front
of 'the machine' that the 'milk of human kindness' has dried up, to be
replaced with superciliousness and sniggers behind the hand?

I actually came to ask about Xnews, but what the hell, I'll find my answers
in a warmer gathering.

read about group dynamics and abnormal psychology-it'll be on the net.

GB






--
Falling Rocks! Do not stop!


.

Quantcast