Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- From: Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 22:17:20 +0200
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:43:23 GMT, Alan Connor wrote:
>>> There are newsgroups devoted to different languages, and each
>>> of them use their own character sets.
>>
>> So ypu're already modifying your original statement, which
>> shows you didn't think very hard before posting it.
>>
>
> I further qualified it in response to your post.
>
> Most people would regard that to be an intelligent course
> of action.
Ofcourse, correcting the error is better than sticking to it. But you made
the error already. In your first statement, you only mentioned text groups
in general.
>>> This is an English newsgroup and it uses U.S. ascii.
>>
>> Give me one 'official' document (like an RFC) that states
>> us-ascii should be used in english groups. Ofcourse, we're not
>> going to follow your personal rules.
>>
>
> Just look around. Look at what the vast majority of people
> on English language newsgroups are doing.
The us-ascii charset is the most used charset in english groups. In fact,
it's the most used charset in dutch groups as well. But that doesn't mean
it's the best charset; it only means that most messages don't contain any
special characters. For example: Dialog automatically selects the simplest
possible charset. As soon as I insert a special character, Dialog switches
to a bigger charset (like iso-8859-1 for an é, or iso-8859-15 for a €).
> You shouldn't need anything more than that, but if you do,
> websearch this string:
>
> usenet netiquette
'The' usenet netiquette (RFC 1855) doesn't say anything about using us-ascii
in english groups.
> Note: I don't read "SINNER's" posts, nor any responses to
> them, and he knows that perfectly well.
>
> Or rather, he _should_ know that, because I've tald him
> enough times. Maybe he's losing his memory due to drug
> abuse...
Maybe he, like me, doesn't bother to keep track of other people's killfiles.
--
Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
Unix csh/sh command:
% "How would you rate Quayle's incompetence?
Unmatched ".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- From: SINNER
- Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- References:
- Another Scoring Question
- From: Kugar
- Re: Another Scoring Question
- From: Robert Spanjaard
- [OT] Funny Sig (was: Re: Another Scoring Question)
- From: Alan Connor
- Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- From: »Q«
- Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- From: MartinS
- Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- From: Alan Connor
- Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- From: Robert Spanjaard
- Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- From: Alan Connor
- Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- From: Robert Spanjaard
- Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- From: Alan Connor
- Another Scoring Question
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- Next by Date: Re: Versions of Xnews- Catchup
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Funny Sig
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|