Re: Real Computer Developers (Re: Well, is firing Wagoner good for GM?
- From: I.B.Larfin <no_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:17:09 -0700
"Koolchicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<john.kulczycki@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 1, 11:51 am, gekko <ge...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<abb0f2a7-36f4-4323-86f5-af90b5b09...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Gunter Glieben Glauchen Globen <dearci...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I. B. Larfin wrote:
When I entered the computing field in 1972 the hot jobs were in
operating system development, telecommunication, low-level networking
and so forth. Employers expected you to understand interrupt
handling, multi-threading, actual technical stuff. The other day I
heard someone who should have been "in the know" explaining that IT is
a good field to learn because they need lots of Oracle DBA's. What a
joke.
I amused myself with C and assembler when I was younger, but now the
demand is for high-level languages like perl and PL/SQL. I don't see
why this is a bad thing or indicates decline.
Lots of peeps have variations of the "not invented here" syndrome, along
with this "Why in MY day, you whippersnapper ..." variation.
Mechanics today aren't *real* mechanics because they can't tear apart
and rebuild an 8 cylinder with 4-barrel Holly Whatsit and have it
purrin' within the span of 10 minutes like *I* could back in MY day.
When I entered the engineering world I wasn't a *real* engineer because
I preferred being a code slinger, working down in assembler and
manipulating the signals going to the chips, but I wasn't doing RF work.
Kids today code using DKs and graphics. They plop graphic boxes down on
a computer screen, click a GUI button and out pops the code. They're
not REAL coders.
<shrug>
If you have to think of a way to solve a problem and use some mix of
technical know-how, intuition and creativity, then by golly you're an
engineer/coder/designer. I don't care what your language or tools are.
I don't care if it's laying out nano-chips and tracks, or writing GOTO
statements. It's the method, not the tools that define your job.
--
gekko
"Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations?"
"Mechanics today aren't *real* mechanics because they can't tear apart
and rebuild an 8 cylinder with 4-barrel Holly Whatsit and have it
purrin' within the span of 10 minutes like *I* could back in MY day. "
You must be an engineer.
There is no way to teardown and rebuild a V8 in 10 minutes. I have the
skinned knuckles to prove it.
Automobiles today aren't *real* automobiles that can be disassembled
by an average guy anymore. I think that went away in the early '90s
sometime. Sometimes I wish that I'd kept my first car, a 1953 Ford
customline. The parts were large enough to see. There were few
enough of them to count. The bumper was made of genuine steel you
could barely dent with a sledge hammer.
--
"Yes, I really am that shallow," --Will
http://www.commentsfromnobody.blogspot.com
.
- References:
- Re: Well, is firing Wagoner good for GM?
- From: Gunter Glieben Glauchen Globen
- Real Computer Developers (Re: Well, is firing Wagoner good for GM?
- From: gekko
- Re: Real Computer Developers (Re: Well, is firing Wagoner good for GM?
- From: Koolchicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Well, is firing Wagoner good for GM?
- Prev by Date: Re: Well, is firing Wagoner good for GM?
- Next by Date: Re: Real Computer Developers (Re: Well, is firing Wagoner good for GM?
- Previous by thread: Re: Real Computer Developers (Re: Well, is firing Wagoner good for GM?
- Next by thread: Re: Real Computer Developers (Re: Well, is firing Wagoner good for GM?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|