Re: Musings on taking offense

Mark goes:

On Jan 20, 12:41 pm, Alan Hope <usenet.ident...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Not true.

You've just sunk to the expected level of predictability
which I described before you started posting. I described
your tactic to a TEE!

I predicted that someone would just make flat denials
of the proof that I provide.

What proof?

So easy to repeat like
a crow..."not true, not true, not true."

Well you poor little atheist, the data IS true,

Which data?

and I
its already been proven by individuals far more clever
than you!

Show me.

And then, of course, as I predicted, you call me a "liar".

You're saying things you know not to be true, as well as things you're
obviously too fucking delusional to tell.

Why don't you go back and read how I predicted of your
coming, and exactly how you would operate.

Why don't you show me where you predicted my "coming"?

I've known
your kind for years, and you never actually do your own
homework. Nothing more than an internet naysayer.

Bring you data. Bring your proof. Never mind your predictions,
Nostradamus, whereby you appear to have predicted I would come here
more than a decade after I actually arrived. Show me the proof. What's
so hard about that?

Thanks for trying.

If you don't want to believe in God, or want to worship
a false god, then have at it.

How do you know my God is false? Perhaps he's the one who made the
flowers. Perhaps it's your god who's the false one.

But you will NEVER come
close to proving me wrong, the best you can do, is to
deny facts and call people names. Sophmoric at best.

FOITN.



--
AH
http://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
.

Loading