Re: squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- From: "John Ashby" <johnashby20@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:46:25 -0000
"Koolchicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <john.kulczycki@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:bf6a3d1e-2dee-40a1-8dc8->6200f1aba0a1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Dec 10, 6:22 pm, "John Ashby" <johnashb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Bill Penrose" <dangerousb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3934dc26->8316-4e61-ad1d->f9f526bd5__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?>a63jfAD$z__@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Dec 10, 1:50 pm, "Koolchi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<john.kulczy...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What bothers me is that you have to go 360 degrees to come fullNow I'm not going to sleep until I've figured it out.
circle, 360 degrees to measure the square, but you only have to travel
180 to perimeter a triangle and yet they are all enclosed spaces.
It's not true. 360 for a circle, 270 for a square and 180+alpha for a
triangle where alpha is the angle at the corner from which you start.
I'm just getting over the parallel lines not meeting thing.
Only in a Euclidean universe. Out here in the real world things are
different.
john
Where do you get 270? Four corners 90' each = 360.
You don't need to turn the last corner.
john
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- From: Koolchicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- References:
- squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- From: $Zero
- Re: squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- From: Koolchicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- From: Bill Penrose
- Re: squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- From: John Ashby
- Re: squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- From: Koolchicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- Prev by Date: shitty office chairs
- Next by Date: Re: shitty office chairs
- Previous by thread: Re: squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- Next by thread: Re: squares, circles, triangles, etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|