Re: What a bummer to be Obummer's brother



On Aug 20, 1:34 pm, "Koolchi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<john.kulczy...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Laffin Gas wrote:
"Skipper" <skipSPAMpr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:200820080703494682%skipSPAMpress@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/barackobama/25
90614/Barack-Obamas-lost-brother-found-in-Kenya.html

http://tinyurl.com/5gubz6

Laffin wrote:
Well, this guy will move from Shanty town to DC Town if his bro gets put in.
You democrats have really stepped in it this time Whoop!

--Laffin my gass off

Hussein Obama has more baggage than some guy leaving for a six month stay on
the Space Lab.   More and more of this stuff is going to come out as we get
nearer and nearer to the witching hour.  The liberal media will try to keep
as much of it under wraps as it can, but it will leak out through the
cracks.  It will make Kerry's Swift Boad debacle look like a college panty
raid.

You democrats have really stepped in it this time.

I'm sure Obama had less choice about having a half brother than your
mother had about having you.- Hide quoted text -

I think the point is (based upon what has emerged so
far, which could be incorrect) that while Obama may not
be any Cindy McCain when it comes to money, he has not
really been doing too badly for himself when his imcome
is compared to that of most other Americans. Obama
has a lot to say about "helping others", so why is that
he lets his half-brother live in a shed about the size of
most Americans' bathroom, if not smaller? I am not
saying that Obama has any obligation to put the guy
on easy street the rest of his life. but you might think
that a modest sum might enable the half-brother get
placed in something he could earn a living doing. Maybe
Obama wants the half-brother to pull himself up by his
own bootstraps, but based on the media reports, I doubt
if the poor chap could afford a new pair of shoes, let alone
a pair of boots with straps! If the brother is lazy and
shiftless and lounges around getting high when he
should be out working, that's one thing, but I have not
heard anything to suggest that is the case. The sad
truth is, some liberals are far worse about helping
members of their own family than conservatives
are. That is because in principle, the liberals think
that the government should do it all, so helping a
family member in need is against their principles
(or at least offers them what in their minds is a
good excuse not to do anything).

[Memo from the upstairs office]

- Show quoted text -

.



Relevant Pages