Re: purpose? (was: Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism))
- From: serenebabe <serenebabe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:12:56 -0400
On 2008-03-19 23:00:38 -0400, Ultraviolet <violette@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
serenebabe <serenebabe@xxxxxxxxx> left the cake out in the rain:<...>
<>A common theme was the assumption that people find faith to
understand "why we are here" or "what our greater purpose is" or
other stuff like that. Or that whole after life discussion.
I just don't get it. How can someone think they can know any of
that? And, more importantly, why does there need to be a purpose?
Cells bump into each other and reactions and reactions and it's
all lovely or tragic or whatever.
Many of the greatest thinkers have addressed themselves to these
topics because it's just not intellectually satisfying enough for
some people to go, well, we can't know nuthin' anyway so la la let's
have a beer.
I see your point. Just because it doesn't interest me doesn't mean it's not interesting. Yes?
I suppose since the concept of God is so important to me I'm puzzled that so many God likers consider the "purpose" question so much.
--
It's All About We! (the column)
http://www.serenebabe.net/
.
- References:
- Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- From: Koolchicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- From: hush, puppy
- Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- From: hush, puppy
- Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- From: Ultraviolet
- Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- From: gekko
- Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- From: gekko
- omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- From: serenebabe
- Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- From: Ultraviolet
- Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- From: serenebabe
- Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- From: Jackson Pillock
- Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- From: serenebabe
- Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- From: Jackson Pillock
- Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- From: serenebabe
- Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- From: Knuje
- purpose? (was: Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism))
- From: serenebabe
- Re: purpose? (was: Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism))
- From: Ultraviolet
- Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism
- Prev by Date: Re: God (was: Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism))
- Next by Date: Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism)
- Previous by thread: Re: purpose? (was: Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism))
- Next by thread: Re: purpose? (was: Re: omnipotent (was: Re: Good read so far: In Defense Of Atheism))
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|