Re: MW
- From: Ray Haddad <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:33:32 +0800
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:06:12 -0400, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and "Stan (the Man)" <srkidLOSETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> instead
replied:
Ray Haddad wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:27:14 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and "Stan (the Man)" <newsNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> instead replied:
Ray Haddad <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:m7pth3p6j1t9ph7e2re0ae1n2o63ahto9u@xxxxxxx:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:59:20 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"What, exactly, makes it dumb, Ray? And, What indicates to you that he's
and "RJM" <scratch.pad@xxxxxxxxxx> instead replied:
"Ray Haddad" <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageThis is one of the absolute dumbest posts ever written. You're an
news:o43sh3hpv33ma5jec52pe7g1js93bb8tpe@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:52:28 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"Even more interesting. What are you getting ready for, I wonder. Why
and "RJM" <scratch.pad@xxxxxxxxxx> instead replied:
"Ray Haddad" <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageI'm not ready to do that. When I'm ready, everyone here will see the
news:bmprh35jabjhsif4cbdv6prpl8hjcj6aur@xxxxxxxxxx
... I didThat's interesting. I'm not around often enough to keep in touch.
make an FOIA request. I got a reply. Not one you'd like, but I did
get a reply. And the Ranger log books request. I got a reply to
that, too. Remember when I promised to show them to you if they
proved me wrong? Heh. You haven't seen them yet, have you?
I'd like to see those replies. Why don't you email them, these
proofs that you weren't lying, to your friend Josh? Give him
permission to email me and I'll email him a private gmail address
where he can send me the proofs.
result. Bar none. In the mean time, tread water.
not show me, a trusted member of this ng, that you never lied about
any of your exploits as a serving member of the US forces. I'm
particularly interested in the close encounters you had, both in
combat with enemy forces, and with the grieving wives and families of
your fallen comrades. Don't email me personally, I prefer not to
correspond with you, and I will post any email from you in the ng. I
give you my word that I will not post correspondence from Josh, but if
he tells me that he has had sight of proof that you never lied, I will
accept it and acknowledge it in the ng. As I say, I'm especially
interested in your firefights with enemy soldiers and in your personal
attendances as a (trained) senior representive of the US Navy, in the
homes of sailors killed on active service.
idiot.
an idiot?
Take a guess, hero.
No surprise. As usual, you just toss off whatever random insult you can
think of in your desperate, unsuccessful quest to land a blow, with no
regard whatsoever for any connection to truth or even making any sense.
Then, when you get called on your oft demonstrated ignorance, you trot
out your usual, transparent routine, which has become the most reliable
indication that you've once again stepped on your own dick.
Don't be an idiot yourself, Stan. Both of you refuse e-mail from me
like children throwing tantrums and then pretend to have an interest
in the outcome of this issue. What a hero.
--
Ray
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MW
- From: Stan (the Man)
- Re: MW
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: MW
- Next by Date: Re: So what is a Legal Voyeur? From a girl
- Previous by thread: Re: MW
- Next by thread: Re: MW
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
