Re: Defining "psycho hose beast" over-reaction

On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 04:27:06 -0600, boots <no@xxxxx> wrote:

"Stan (the Man)" <srkidLOSETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Josh Hill wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:14:05 +0100, Jackson Pillock
<jacksonpillock@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:57:08 -0700, Ed <edrhodes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sep 29, 10:30 am, Jackson Pillock <jacksonpill...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:24:07 -0700, Ed <edrho...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 29, 2:08 am, Sylvia <syl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ed <edrho...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sylvia wrote:
Ed <edrho...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sylvia wrote:
.
<...>
"Patients suffering from psychosis have impaired reality
testing;
that is, they are unable to distinguish personal, subjective
experience from the reality of the external world."
.
Now, Ed, Ray Haddad *insists* to have bombed Hanoi in 974, long
after the rest of the world agrees that the United States
signed a peace treaty and withdrew from the war in Vietnam.
There is NO record anywhere of the bombing Ray Haddad claims.
Not even in Hanoi.
.
I don't think there <was> a Hanoi <or> a United States in 974... Ray
may have been around though.
"Sorry, I type quickly and don't catch many errors. [...]
That actually happens to be a major problem with me too! Still fun to
make fun of though!
Hello? I'm quoting *you*.
I thought you were explaining why you dropped the "1" Oh well.
"I've noticed that in picking apart my post's spelling flaws,
you've ignored once again its main point."
-- The Hypocrisy of Ed Rhodes
.
Sorry if I didn't provide a case by case scenario that could be peer
reviewed in an appropriate journal.
I did not say that, Ed. Those are *also* your words.
You ask me to "prove" why your posts are scary and obsessed. I am
unable to "prove" a personal opinion. That doesn't make the opinion
any less valid.
Yes it does. It makes it far less valid.



It was just a snarky comment inspired by an impression upon going
through these threads.
So, Ed, is "just a snarky comment" going to be your standard response to
avoid admitting you've been repeatedly making unfounded accusations or
to avoid facing that you've been defending Haddad's lies?
Probably. Sometimes you just can't take this crap so seriously.
I haven't made "unfounded accusations." I don't believe I've accused
you of anything. I've simply stated my opinion that, in following
these many threads you've developed, your persona is scary, obsessed
and disturbing.
Well, how can you tell it's not frivolous, silly, and delighful? You
must have something to base your opinion on. Do you just go around,
forming random opinions?

'In my opinion, cats are dogs.'

Valid.
I'm going to misspell this, I'm sorry. Did you ever see (or read) the
play "Rinoscerous?"
I did, actually.

There's a philospher who's a strict logician in the opening who you
would appreciate.
I see. Because I don't consider all opinions equally valid, whether or
not they are supported by any kind of argument or example, I must
therefore be exactly the same as an absurd logician.

Reminds me of an argument I had with Stan. He insisted in the
patronizing superior know-it-all voice that he adopts when he's about
to say something particularly silly that an opinion couldn't be wrong.

Still too stupid to grasp the difference between matters of opinion and
matters of fact, eh, Hotlips? Tell everyone again how rilly, rilly smart
you are. Give us all a good titter.

Heh. And he claims /I'm/ in meltdown mode.

Yes Josh, please do, I like tits.

Funny thing, tits: they're only likeable in pairs. I mean, one tit
would be gross, and three tits, and even another even number like
four, unless you were some kind of critter in the hamburger clade.

--
Josh

"You start out in 1954 by saying, ?***, ***, ***,? By
1968, you can?t say ?***? -- that hurts you. Backfires. So
you say stuff like forced busing, states? rights, and all that stuff.
You?re getting so abstract now you?re talking about cutting taxes,
and all these things you?re talking about are totally economic things,
and a byproduct of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites."

- GOP Strategist Lee Atwater on the Republican Southern Strategy
.

Quantcast