Re: what uplifts your spirits?

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:59:07 -0700, Towse <self@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Josh Hill wrote:

But what's I find saddest of all is that a woman would support a
practice that demeans another woman.

How noble of you.

Except that Hillary calls herself "Hillary" because calling herself
"Clinton" might um. (1)cause confusion (2)get certain folks' hackles up
whom the handlers are trying to keep hackles-down and (3)she'd much much
rather be calling herself Rodham but she burnt that bridge too many
years ago.

Nope.

Your "sadness" is silly holier-than-thou and retching to the max.

Nope. It's disgust at the "stand by your man" *** still prevalent in
the least developed regions of the country. Of course, free thinker
that I am, I'm equally repelled by its feminazi, politically correct
opposite. I simply believe that men and women should be accorded the
same opportunity, compensation, and respect, and whether in the
boardroom or on the political scene addressing a woman as no man would
allow himself to be addressed is not part of that vision.

--
Josh

"You start out in 1954 by saying, ?***, ***, ***,? By
1968, you can?t say ?***? -- that hurts you. Backfires. So
you say stuff like forced busing, states? rights, and all that stuff.
You?re getting so abstract now you?re talking about cutting taxes,
and all these things you?re talking about are totally economic things,
and a byproduct of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites."

- GOP Strategist Lee Atwater on the Republican Southern Strategy
.

Quantcast