Re: It Won't Be Long

Josh Hill wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:27:54 +0100, "Jackson Pillock"
<jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Ray Haddad" <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:t50gd3lc6h56p07qg8jpq944cprj2ne3fm@xxxxxxxxxx

In other words, the stuff she writes wouldn't be allowed as
testimony in a court. Thank you for making that abundantly clear.
Sylvia's not appearing as a witness. She's a prosecuting attorney, and her evidence is YOUR OWN TESTIMONY.

Sylvia lies through her tooth.

Poor little Joshers. I suppose you feel you must attempt to defend your boy-toy, impotent as your support may be. Unfortunately for you and your squeeze, you can't cite one lie Sylvia's told. Yet your lies can be easily listed. Or, would you care to back up your lying claim that Sylvia has an std, you low-life half-wit?

That doesn't make Ray innocent of every charge of puffery, error, or
trolling, but it does make Sylvia guilty of the very "crime,"
dishonesty, with which she's charged Ray

It does no such thing, you obsequious, floating buffoon. She's supported everything she's said with Ray's own words. He's a liar and you're his eager ass-licker.

-- something which one can't
say of Sal Towse, John Ashby, and the others who have concerned
themselves with the actual evidence.

Bwah! The actual evidence is Ray's words, you laughable moron.

In fact, the actualities of this case were decided to a reasonable
degree of probability long ago: some barstool blarney, a core of
truth, the usual Rayish trolling.

Oh, dear. You try so hard. What "core of truth" are you talking about, cowardly liar?

In Sylvia's case, the troll's
disregard for the truth and classically manic behavior that, if not
psychotic (I've seen no evidence of depression, so it doesn't seem to
be bipolar disorder), merits diagnosis and perhaps treatment by a
mental health professional.

Heh. Back to projecting, eh, ass-licker? I suppose you can't be blamed for trying to protect your new suck toy. If anything happened to him, you'd be the most reviled and contemptible poster in the ng.

--
Stan
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can a court transcript of a grand theft trial be used as a evidence for a later conversion trial
    ... as evidence in his civil suit? ... If a witness lies during testimony ... that the same witness is not trustworthy because of changing testimony. ... One of the requirements for admissibility of former testimony is that the ...
    (misc.legal)
  • Re: Blair, another one bites the dust !
    ... Only for their testimony, and furthermore, the subject of their ... comments about evidence when applied to any particular person. ... Fatima is conned into testifying that her father would never do ... something like set a bomb in the marketplace that splattered the guts ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Hot topic
    ... Respected Member of the Group and reported back that he was a grouchy ... suppress the courteous generous side of themselves in favour of ... Explanations are evidence, evidence that should be weighed and judged ... The notion that we should not consider the testimony ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Can a court transcript of a grand theft trial be used as a evidence for a later conversion trial
    ... The transcript of the criminal trial is not admissible evidence in the ... the transcript of prior testimony may be used to prove he ... Evidence of former testimony is hearsay if it is offered to prove the truth ... that the same witness is not trustworthy because of changing testimony. ...
    (misc.legal)
  • Re: Can a court transcript of a grand theft trial be used as a evidence for a later conversion trial
    ... as evidence in his civil suit? ... the transcript of prior testimony may be used to prove he ... Evidence of former testimony is hearsay if it is offered to prove the truth ... that the same witness is not trustworthy because of changing testimony. ...
    (misc.legal)