Re: It Won't Be Long


"Ray Haddad" <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:81gad3to1ne0jiieeh9j3p8umll5ebmqm9@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:37:05 +0100, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and "Jackson Pillock" <jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> instead replied:

"Ray Haddad" <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:v9u9d3p4j7b9gu8daoveilvv30dib0copf@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:23:41 -0500, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and Sylvia <sylvia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> instead replied:

LIAR! LIAR LIAR!

Gee, you seem to be awfully proud of the fact that over the past 6
months or so you have wasted thousands, perhaps millions or billions
of bytes of bandwidth and hundreds of hours of your personal time
making up stories about me. For what? Even you have failed to
explain that one. Poor baby. Such a waste.

Just how deep is your obsession, Sylvia? Hmmm???

Did you ask Sir Edmund Hillary, 'Why Everest?' Did you ask Kennedy, 'Why
the
Apollo program?'

Never met any of them. Why would I ask empty air?

The real question should be, why don't YOU care about why she does
it, Jackson?

Huh? I don't really know why she does it. I assume you pissed her off at
some stage. Could be when you insinuated she was having an affair with Stan.
Or maybe it was the several times you used what she found to be sexually
demeaning language. Or maybe your valour-thievery offends her morals or
sense of honour. Those would be my guesses, based on what she says to you in
her posts. Probably she takes some sadistic glee in it as well, which is a
bit naughty. But then, you protest that it doesn't upset you. Maybe, if you
want her to stop, you should be direct. Tell her how you feel about it. Be
direct and honest for once. Might work.

For me, this is all anticlimactic. I mean, nothing's ever going to top the
Doug Reese sequence is it?

Ray: Sen. Kerry shot an unarmed kid in the back and they gave him a medal
for it.

Doug: That's not how it happened. The 'kid' was 27, and he had a loaded
rocket launcher.

Ray: Eyewitnesses say different, but hey, whatever.

Doug: I was there. And when I say I was there, I mean boots on the ground,
there on the Dung Cong canal, that day in Febrary, 1969.

Jackson: Excuse me, but that's a bold claim.

Doug: Google me.

The best bit is, Doug Reese was one of those "Eyewitnesses" who were
presented in Unfit for Command as wronged heroes. You had probably imagined,
when you read about him in that book, that Doug Reese was a buddy in the
Swift Boats for 'Truth.' And there he was, too polite to call you a liar
about having seen combat, yet making it plain that that's what he thought
(pointing out, for instance, where you got it wrong on incoming mortars, and
letting you know that there is no reason in the world why you can't just say
where and when and what you did in Vietnam). And meanwhile, telling you,
from first hand, that Unfit for Command is a crock of ***.

That's it, game over, baby. The rest is post-script.




--
Ray


.