Re: is this turning into yet another one of those cliche rhetorical question pun cascades?

On Aug 23, 9:28 pm, Alan Hope <usenet.ident...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
$Zero goes:

On Aug 23, 6:15 pm, Alan Hope <usenet.ident...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
$Zero goes:
On Aug 23, 5:16?am, boots <n...@xxxxx> wrote:
Alan Hope <usenet.ident...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm an expert in the human condition.
Excellent, please repair it, it's fucked.
Alan's expertise and his working solution on the matter is just as
silly as yours.
What "working solution" are you talking about, you raving loon?
your self-defeating cynicism, genius.

Blah. It possibly makes some sense to you.

are you so pessimistically delusional that you think your excessive
cynicism has always done you right?

anyway, you can't totally repair the human condition, but you can
bickerfest about it!
As if.
yikes.

Well no-one does, do they?

people bickerfest day and night. duh.

i'm just cashing in on all that.

and making it much more than just pointless arguing.

way more constructive content than just "bickering".

providing laughs and smiles (and useful mutually benefitial
productive ideas) for all who read it.
i.e. nobody.
snore.

Indeed.

agreed.

anyway, gee, i'll bet you would have tried to talk the wikipedia
people out of doing their thing, no?

and the Google peeps.

and the blogspotters and twitters.

and the Jobs and Gates.

and Edisons and Teslas.


(thus slightly improving the human condition for all concerned).
i.e. for nobody.
what's that snoring condition where you can't get enough oxygen while
you sleep?
oh yeah, sleep apnea.

Why do you suppose bickerfest is so boring?

even in its present pre-beta form its less boring than your ***.


but Alan doesn't even want to do that much.
Of course.
indeed.
you take yourself far too seriously for your own good.

Is that supposed to hurt me?

it's supposed to help enlighten you.

i realize that's a hefty goal, but... i'm an optmist for the most
part.

and you're a relatively intelligent sort, so it's not like i'm totally
wasting my time on you.

if you could ever ditch your foolish pride in this matter, there's
much fruit to be had for you.

plus, i can use your skepticism to develop my various advertising
pieces and public stock-offering literature.

C.G. <-----

he'd rather whine here on mw.
I'd rather do what I want, and not have to work for you in any
capacity.
as if doing what you want over in bickerfest is some sort of drudgery
job, yikes!

It has you involved. What a nightmare.

partly.

i _can_ be rather difficult at times.

but that shouldn't effect anybody else's experience with bickerfest.

just mine.

i'm a relentless tweaker.


imagine working for such an "employer" as i, my oh my.

Yeah, imagine. Does anyone not get a shudder at the thought?

oh well, good thing i don't have to rely on the totally objective and
fair people of misc.writing, aye?


Show of hands.

hands up!


I'm sure I'm not alone. Oh no wait. I'm certainly not alone.
i think it's safe to say that you are COMPLETELY alone with that kind
of insanity.

Oh. Then where are all the bickerfest hordes?

just around the corner.

the petty folk of mw are just getting first dibs, remember?


The entire population of the planet has declined to become involved
with you, to a man.
yeah, because each and every one of them has been offered the
opportunity.

And they all said no thanks.

no, that would just be you and boots.

oh, and Sal.

bizarre as you all are about taking yourselves so overly seriously.

makes me kinda sad, 'cause i'd love you guys to come play, but hey..

you've all got your petty reasons so who am i to mock you?


So there you are, then.
well, sure, logic dictates.
he's just as stupidly negative and pointlessly self-defeating as
yourself in that regard.
Self-defeating? How so?
i can't be arsed to explain such simple matters to one of your
"intellect".

Can't even fucking spell the word.

careless typo corrected for your grasping-at-straws anal self.


I also declined to be roped into your project the last time this
self-same idea came up several years ago.
back then it was just one of many tangents.
this time i'm super serious.

You may be, but nobody else is.

wrong.



Was I wrong then?
yes.

How many checks did you write?

none. never got off the ground. duh.

didn't have the forum software, nor the domain, and my investor at the
time had other problems to deal with, IIRC.


No. It came to nothing.
true, but that's only because i threw in the towel on it.
not this time.

Zzzz.

eeeerrrrroooo....


no siree.

Zzzz.

eeeerrrrroooo....


and i've got the domain this round.

Oh. That makes all the diff.

it can.

anyway, shows how much you know about marketing.


plus a whole lot more!
cha' ching!
Not a soul was ever paid,
well, none ever worked, so that's no surprise at all, is it?
and indeed the plan never saw the light of day.
true.
it was just a brilliant theory back then.

It was a stupid motherfucking idea then, and it still is.

this is where i resort to the dull but handy "whatever"


Watch and learn.

my advice exactly.


Now you're doing THE SAME THING.
yes. but this time i'm actually doing it.

That only makes it worse.

where did you get all of this business acumen of yours?


duh.

A lunatic idea executed is worse than a lunatic idea in theory alone.

what's "lunatic" about it, visionless-boy?

nothing, that's what.

duh.


do try to keep up.
Is that the sound of the clue-penny dropping?
i sure hope so, you self-defeating fool.

I still don't see how I'm defeating myself. You think I might be
cheating myself out of a hundred bucks? Sorry, a hundred bucks A WEEK!

how much are you making posting your amusing *** to mw?

ring that up on your idiotic cash register.

then remember, if you can manage it, that the $100 is just a beta-pay.

your talent is the only upper limit.


Why, over the course of three months that comes to ... nothing at all.

that's a hell of a lot more "nothing" than what you get for posting
your typings to mw.

duh.

but you keep doing your silly, overly cynical, "math".


No, I rather doubt it.
of course you do.
reject the brainwash of "intelligent" and "stylish" cynicism, you
silly people.
And sign up for Zero's pointless pipe-dream.
yikes.
stop taking yourselves wayyy too seriously.
Let's see, who has "investors"? Boots? No, Zero.
just about, yep.

Only just about?

three of them.

i'm trying to decide who's offer i like better.

and who will be easier to deal with.

which of them is most emotionally and financially mature, etc.


Who proclaims his creative genius every fine minutes? Boots? No. Zero.
well, i have far less false modesty than most.

You have more to be modest about.

perhaps. perahps not.


Who begs for other people to write his blog, and organises campaigns
of hate against those (moi) who refuse? Boots? No, Zero.
i haven't done ANY of that.

Ahem. What do you call this?

playful bickering.

yours is far more of a "hateful" campaign than my mockery of your
mockery.

because you're fooling around with my livelihood.

but that's ok. it's all grist for the bickerfest.


now you're wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyTF off the deep end.
Who is looking to employ Interweb writers at $100 a week? Boots? No,
Zero.
beta-pay, yep.

A hunded beta dollars buys exactly how many cups of nasty bitter burnt
coffee?

so how many cups of nasty joe are you buying on your misc.writing
salary?


Never mind, in the time it took to answer any fool could have
made more than a C-note.

but you didn't.

you wasted your time posting to mw against bickerfest.

when you would have been perfectly welcome to post your criticisms in
the bickerfest

which, for doing so, would have given you at least a reasonable chance
of getting some money out of your bitter criticisms.


Who claims to have invented AOL buddy lists? Boots? No, that was Zero.
yep. that was moi.
Who's taking himself way too seriously here,
so... is there ANYONE who's not clear on that?
i should think not, FS.

Poor narcissist.

because i invented buddy lists that makes me a poor narcissist?

your logic is as about as rational as your business "sense".


-$Zero...

htpp://www.whooooooosh.com

.

Quantcast