Re: Drs. Cindy and Dave's 237 reasons to have sex list
- From: "chris.editrix@xxxxxxxxx" <chris.editrix@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:01:26 -0700
On Jul 31, 10:03 am, Skipper <skipspaml...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1185891533.260290.26...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<"chris.edit...@xxxxxxxxx"> wrote:
The Why's of Mating in theNYTimes today:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/31/science/31tier.html?th&emc=th
You can go to the list and see how many of the reasons you've used. I
stopped counting at 40--and that's just with one partner!
Sure, some are variations on a theme. But still. . .
http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/Group/BussLAB/measures/why_ha...
asons.doc
Chris.tine
I do it to keep from going on Usenet and wondering what the chicks look
like.
I think they are talking about sex in which another person is
involved, dear.
Chris.tine
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Drs. Cindy and Dave's 237 reasons to have sex list
- From: Skipper
- Re: Drs. Cindy and Dave's 237 reasons to have sex list
- References:
- Drs. Cindy and Dave's 237 reasons to have sex list
- From: chris.editrix@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Drs. Cindy and Dave's 237 reasons to have sex list
- From: Skipper
- Drs. Cindy and Dave's 237 reasons to have sex list
- Prev by Date: Re: obligatory wave
- Next by Date: Re: Let's argue about... English
- Previous by thread: Re: Drs. Cindy and Dave's 237 reasons to have sex list
- Next by thread: Re: Drs. Cindy and Dave's 237 reasons to have sex list
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
