Re: Let's argue about... English
- From: Towse <self@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:34:14 -0700
$Zero wrote:
On Jul 30, 1:48?pm, Bill Penrose <penr...@xxxxxxx> wrote:On Jul 30, 3:43 am, $Zero <zeroi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Let's argue about... EnglishI think the votes are in. English has already shown itself to be too
complicated, too hard to pronounce, too arbitrary, and too ambiguous
to make it useful as a real method of communication. Besides, it has
too many words.
The chances of English eclipsing Esperanto as the international
language of mankind are laughable, at best
i propose we switch to drums.
...
sans drumsticks, of course.
Greedy. How come =you= always get the drumsticks?
--
Sal
Ye olde swarm of links: thousands of links for writers, researchers and the terminally curious <http://writers.internet-resources.com>
.
- References:
- Let's argue about... English
- From: $Zero
- Re: Let's argue about... English
- From: Bill Penrose
- Re: Let's argue about... English
- From: $Zero
- Let's argue about... English
- Prev by Date: Re: Let's argue about... English
- Next by Date: Re: The author Chuck Palahniuk
- Previous by thread: Re: Let's argue about... English
- Next by thread: Re: Let's argue about... English
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|