Re: to keep you from having difficulties of greater proportions -- Ray (the nice guy)

On Jun 18, 5:01?am, Ray Haddad <rhad...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

$Zero <z...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> instead replied:
On Jun 18, 3:07?am, Ray Haddad <rhad...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
$Zero <z...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> instead replied:
On Jun 18, 12:35?am, Josh Hill <userepl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:20:19 -0700, $Zero <z...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

[...mercy snip...]

I don't do gangfuckings

nor do i.

and I don't "coordinate" defenses.

you've admitted as much already, FFS.

Bull***.

what really brought you back here to mw?

be honest.

I am rarely anything else.

I was bored. Decided to look in. Gekko mentioned my name. I popped in.

so, let me see if i got this straight.

Ray felt totally comfortable emailing Bob Sloan for a "personal favor"
Navy "shipmate" back-up, even after Ray made a pig of himself over
Sloan's friend "P"'s death -- Ray contacted a person who has told him
several times that he doesn't want any emails from him,

"As long as you have an e-mail address,
you have no say over whether or not
I send you an e-mail. Get used to it."
-- Ray (the nice guy terrorist) Haddad

and BONUS, this Sloan is a person who, militarily-speaking, has argued
against Ray's utter bull*** in the past -- so Ray emails Sloan for a
"personal favor", but not you, his RL buddy who also has shipmate
status..

Do you even know what a shipmate is?

i seem to recall Josh "knowledgably" verifying Navy protocols or
flightdeck technicality stuff or someuch, in your defense.

That's not what a shipmate is.

Josh was posturing as one.

and, IIRC, just like he always does, he made some sort of claim to be
an expert of some sort, citing his own experiences.

am i mistaken in that recollection, do-not-"repeat"-boy?

Josh has as much knowledge of the navy as Sylvia does. They can both
use Google and Wiki.

so everything he said on the matter is disqualified by you.

ok.

and while you're twisting away, did you email Josh about any of your
"troubles" before he arrived back here, or not? *

No. I did not.

so you're claiming that you didn't discuss it AT ALL before he posted?
not in email, nor by phone, telegraph, Morse-code, smoke signals, or
any and all other weaselly dishonest ambiguous possibilities?

you guys haven't been keeping in touch since your little lovefest last
year (or a couple years ago, or a decade ago, or whatever other
weaselly dishonest ambiguous possibilities there are?)


[see also Ray's usual desperate snippage]

* see if you can manage a straight unambiguous answer.

About why I snipped the rest of your insane ramblings?

you can't follow asterics?

About why I snipped the rest of your insane ramblings?
Well, that's why. They are insane ramblings.

oh.

yet somehow you missed several lines above.

i get it.

how insane!

BTW: just like those with a blackbelt, legally, i'm obliged to notify
you:

you're about to have a nervous breakdown.

there.

you've been adequately warned.


[Alan Hope makes a witty reply and
Ray Haddad despicably and cowardly
turns it into pure degenerate ugliness]

">Good. Lie down and die.

When you wrote that to P,
he took you seriously.
No, seriously."
-- Ray (the nice guy terrorist) Haddad


[Bob (the "P") Pastorio himself drives home the point]

">>No, seriously.

>If you're going to imitate me, then try
>to get some content in so it's more accurate.

Bob, if you check Giggle, you'll find that I've
been around a few more decades than you using that
particular comment. I like it. I always have.
If you don't like me "imitating" you, change your
comment to something else. When I see you here
moaning about it, I know I'm under your skin.
You deserve no less."
-- Ray (the nice guy terrorist) Haddad

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/2556fd43f1635f23



-$Zero...

http://groups.google.com/group/megablog/topics

.

Loading