Re: [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- From: Alan Hope <not.alan.hope@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:13:29 +0100
Ray Haddad goes:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:40:25 -0700, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and boots <no@xxxxx> instead replied:
There's a rating scale for movies that tells parents how raw the movie
is. Perhaps we need a rating scale for posts that tells the reader
how thoroughly obfuscated the post is. Words of more than 4 syllables
might knock a post out of the "G" rating, thoughts more complex than
"rock" might move it to "PG", etc. Maybe we also need a weasel index.
Whatchall think? I think it sounds like a lot of trouble. A nap is
far more appealing.
If you need help and advice for reading how is it you're here on a
writers' newsgroup?
If it's a writers' newsgroup, what are you doing here?
--
AH
http://this-thing-of-ours.blogspot.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- From: Ray Haddad
- Re: [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- References:
- [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- From: boots
- Re: [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- From: Ray Haddad
- [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- Prev by Date: Re: [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- Next by Date: Re: [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- Previous by thread: Re: [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- Next by thread: Re: [O=PG] difficulty: G? PG? R? X? XXX?
- Index(es):