Re: [W] French Wimps

Ray Haddad wrote:

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:45:05 +0100, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and Alan Hope <not.alan.hope@xxxxxxxx> instead replied:

Ray Haddad goes:

On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:09:27 -0000, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and "Steve Pritchard" <Steve_Pritchard@xxxxxxxxxxxx> instead
replied:
"Ray Haddad" <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7bs602t42cjur983pplq296686508j96b7@xxxxxxxxxx
Ray, by blowing up the ship a man died. The fact the ship has the
word
"warrior" in its name hardly means that the bloke at the helm
deserved
to die, does it?

Where did I write that he deserves to die? Do you have any idea
the history of the name of the ship? Google it.

This history of the ship's name has NO BEARING on the fact that the
French blew it up and killed a man. None at all.

Did I ever state that it did? I simply asked you a question which
thus far you have chosen not to answer. Fine with me but don't ever
put such words down to me, Steve. YOU, not me, have connected the
dots between the name of a ship and a man being killed.

You brought it up to show they weren't non-violent, as if it does
that.

I will ask the question again which I am certain you will decline to
answer. Since when has Greenpeace been a peaceful organization?

As for Greenpeace not being a peaceful organisation, well, what's
the point in trying to explain.

They collide with other ships at sea, impede military warship
movement and have taken it upon themselves to interfere with the
Coast Guard during the performance of their duties on numerous
occasions.

They do what? Impede movement of military ships. Oh my God, I'd not
realised they were so vicious! You're right - we should kill them
all!

That's a felony and a terrorist act, mate. Like it or not, you can
find more by a simple Google search. But then, why would you?

They're not peaceful, mate. You want to cut down a tree? They'll
spike it with nails so you will be killed or maimed when your
chain saw hits them. Non violent nails, right?

You can show me which tree they did this with, right? Or is this up
there with your gun laws and malls argument?

http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/03_04_OT.pdf

Can you not read? That document mentions tree-spiking in connection
with a totally different organisation. They're on to Earth First
before the subject of tree-spiking comes up.

Do a Google search using the terms <Greenpeace tree spiking> leaving
out the brackets and you can find numerous cites including those
which resulted in fatalities from tree spiking.

You'll get results like the above, where the terms are mentioned in
the same document (a nine-page PDF) but with no connection between
them. You didn't even fucking look, did you? Clown.

Funded by Greenpeace, Alan DOPE. Read for clarity next time.


I've just read through the document (fairly quickly, I admit) and I
can't see where the funding link between GreenPeace and EarthFirst is
established. Could you narrow it down?

john (EarthFirst, good advice for an electrician)

.