Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: Dr Zen <longhornster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:57:09 +1000
C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la guerre. "B--"
<rollandbet@thotmail(dot).com> led the charge, yelling:
>"Dr Zen" <longhornster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:309gt1he07mihvvlveff8b21hfuhhv8mck@xxxxxxxxxx
>> C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la guerre. "B--"
>> <rollandbet@thotmail(dot).com> led the charge, yelling:
>>
>>>"Dr Zen" <longhornster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:6cadt15epk1sfqdguraijjhqu492ebef6h@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la guerre. ing
>>>> <ing.blueyes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> led the charge, yelling:
>>>>
>>>>>B-- wrote:
>>>>>> "ing" <ing.blueyes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1p9Bf.3938$ft2.77796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>John Kulczycki wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>ing wrote:
>>>(snipity snip snip)
>>>>
>>>> Here's what you fervent believers in democracy just never quite
>>>> get.
>>>> Harper won. It doesn't matter about the size of the majority.
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Dr Zen
>>>
>>>Yes it does on a technical level, because without a large enough
>>>majority the other parties in parliament can gang up on them and
>>>force
>>>an election with a non-confidence vote.
>>>
>>
>> No, stupid, they can't. They can only do that if his own party stabs
>> him in the back. That's what a majority is: more votes than everyone
>> else put together.
>>
>> It's a common mistake in Western democracies to believe that the
>> size
>> of the majority is important. It isn't. What's important is party
>> discipline.
>>
>>
>>>Not, as Ing and John both mention, that it is likely to happen
>>>anytime
>>>soon; if only because no party can afford another election campaign
>>>right away, and so will not force a non-confidence vote.
>>>
>>>But if in another couple of years (I think no party would dare cross
>>>the mood of the electorate and force another vote too soon) Harper
>>>looks vulnerable, they will find an excuse and go for it. If Harper
>>>amazes us all and keeps the electorate happy and content they may
>>>get
>>>their full four years, as the opposition is not going to force the
>>>country to an election they wouldn't have a chance of winning.
>>
>> The fact remains that your compatriots are now officially fucking
>> idiots.
>> --
>(snip)
>
>> Dr Zen
>
>Yo, bad tempered dude:
>
>Final seats in this parliament
>(http://enr.elections.ca/National_e.aspx):
>Conservatives - 124 seats
>Liberals - 103 seats
>N.D.P. - 29 seats
>Bloc Québécois - 51
>Independent - 1
>
>Do the math. Harper has the most seats in the parliament and can
>therefore form the government. But, the other parties, combined, have
>more seats in the house than his party does and therefore can bring
>the government down. It's an inaccurate convenience to call his lead a
>majority, and I don't really give a rats' ass if you approve of the
>terminology or not.
Sorry, fuckwit, he simply doesn't have a majority and you're talking
***. Presumably the BQ aren't willing to form a coalition with the
Liberals?
--
Dr Zen
Bandits with planes and Moors,
bandits with finger-rings and duchesses,
bandits with black friars spattering blessings
came through the sky to kill children
and the blood of children ran through the streets
without fuss, like children's blood.
Jackals that the jackals would despise,
stones that the dry thistle would bite on and spit out,
vipers that the vipers would abominate!
http://gollyg.blogspot.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: B--
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: John Kulczycki
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- References:
- Watch Out, John K
- From: Ray Haddad
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: John Kulczycki
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: ing
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: John Kulczycki
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: ing
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: B--
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: ing
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: Dr Zen
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: B--
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: Dr Zen
- Re: Watch Out, John K
- From: B--
- Watch Out, John K
- Prev by Date: Re: Watch Out, John K
- Next by Date: Re: Bill Ford for President.
- Previous by thread: Re: Watch Out, John K
- Next by thread: Re: Watch Out, John K
- Index(es):
Loading