Re: Obscene


"Dr Zen" <longhornster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5j86r15bc8omci0s6g8qpr5no5e6bok89v@xxxxxxxxxx
> "Pies de Arcilla" <dearcilla@xxxxxxxxx> gave the sermon. Those who
> could keep their eyes open remember it thus:
>
>>
>>gekko wrote:
>>> Hi, "Pies de Arcilla" <dearcilla@xxxxxxxxx>! I'm responding to your
>>> message news:1135990593.534186.298330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>>> which you posted to misc.writing on 30 Dec 2005:
>>>
>>>
>>> > If the vaccine results in a change in people's behaviour toward
>>> > the risky, it could conceivably have an overall negative effect on
>>> > health.
>>> >
>>> > It's called "risk homeostasis."
>>>
>>> _If_ there are sufficient protections against the undesirable aspects
>>> of sex, then what is the negative effect on health?
>>
>>Mortality from cervical cancer is around 1:30000 women. If the
>>hypothetical increase in risky behavior exceeds 1:30000 mortality then
>>the net result of the vaccine would be to kill people.
>>
>
> Yes, well done. Now *** off.
>
>
>
>
> Dr Zen
> Godless. Potless. Not Completely Hopeless.
> http://gollyg.blogspot.com

Could Piers have a tighter anus? I don't think so.

-
Rob
-


.