Re: Obscene


"gekko" <gekko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns973CBE91D64BEcrinkles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi, "Pies de Arcilla" <dearcilla@xxxxxxxxx>! I'm responding to your
> message news:1135990593.534186.298330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> which you posted to misc.writing on 30 Dec 2005:
>
>
>> If the vaccine results in a change in people's behaviour toward
>> the risky, it could conceivably have an overall negative effect on
>> health.
>>
>> It's called "risk homeostasis."
>
> _If_ there are sufficient protections against the undesirable aspects
> of sex, then what is the negative effect on health?
>
> Condoms are insufficient protection against HPV. The vaccine provides
> that protection. Condoms _do_ protect against HIV, syphillus,
> gonnorrhea (sp), herpes (the disease, not the lizard), pregnancy ...
>
> There are other protections available.
>
> It's not health they're looking to protect, but the idea that children
> should not be having sex.
>
> --
> gekko
>
> Pardon our dust -- this signature temporarily closed for repairs.

the media has a lot to answer for, gek; when I was watching cable last
night, I saw in-your- face sex on almost every channel: writhing bodies on
mtv, sex, sex, sex on the comedy channel, sex-comedies on other channels;
when I was young I watched gilligan's island and ginger was 'bout the only
sexual person on tv.

rob


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Obscene
    ... >>> transmitted disease that is the primary cause of cervical cancer. ... >>> The vaccine produced 100 percent immunity in the 6,000 women who ... Josh read a piece of an op-ed in the NYT and chose ... > That is predicated on the notion that premarital sex is harmful ... ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Obscene
    ... >> Mortality from cervical cancer is around 1:30000 women. ... >> hypothetical increase in risky behavior exceeds 1:30000 mortality ... >> then the net result of the vaccine would be to kill people. ... > sex (and, quite frankly, even marital sex is "risky" if the husband ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Obscene
    ... > Mortality from cervical cancer is around 1:30000 women. ... > hypothetical increase in risky behavior exceeds 1:30000 mortality ... > then the net result of the vaccine would be to kill people. ... sex (and, quite frankly, even marital sex is "risky" if the husband ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Obscene
    ... >>> of sex, then what is the negative effect on health? ... >>Mortality from cervical cancer is around 1:30000 women. ... >>the net result of the vaccine would be to kill people. ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Obscene
    ... >> "FORBIDDEN VACCINE Ever year, about 500,000 women throughout the ... >> transmitted disease that is the primary cause of cervical cancer. ... reduce their incentive to abstain from premarital sex. ...
    (misc.writing)