Re: Not-Jack
- From: "set" <tridentzzn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:07:35 -0000
"set" <tridentzzn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43b5f59f$0$18198$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "gekko" <gekko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Xns973CC659BD8A1crinkles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> It's a zob95@xxxxxxxxx thing, innit, where
>> news:1135995914.929418.264520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, posted
>> to misc.writing, reveals:
>>
>>
>>> Jack was not Jack. The mind of Not-Jack was powerful to be sure,
>>> and put up a strong defense against a host of aggressive routines
>>> which eventually did take control. Not-Jack was being pursued in
>>> the physical world and that was also coming to a resolution. The
>>> pursuers had him cornered in an alley.
>>>
>>> Jack performed a data dump on the mind of Not-Jack. He wanted
>>> copies of the latest invasive routines. Now it was time. Jack
>>> smiled as he triggered the self-destruct. 'Two sets of birds with
>>> one stone,' he thought.
>>>
>>
>> So is this the guy who was looking for feedback? I need to know if
>> it's the same one, because I intended to ignore that one. If it's
>> not that one, then I need to make a fresh contract with this one
>> regarding refusing to provide feedback.
>>
>> Someone let me know. 'k?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> gekko
>>
>> Pardon our dust -- this signature temporarily closed for repairs.
>
> Gek, he received a www.topscrettraining.com dvd under santa's tree?
>
> Robbie
>
oops, www.topsecrettraining.com
Rob
.
- References:
- Not-Jack
- From: zob95
- Re: Not-Jack
- From: gekko
- Re: Not-Jack
- From: set
- Not-Jack
- Prev by Date: Re: Not-Jack
- Next by Date: Re: 24-Hr. Correspondence
- Previous by thread: Re: Not-Jack
- Next by thread: Hats
- Index(es):