Re: Innocent!
- From: Ray Haddad <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:02:10 +0800
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 00:57:39 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and gekko <gekko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> instead replied:
>This is an attribution line. In this, I'm expected to cite the author,
>Dr Zen <longhornster@xxxxxxxxx>, and the date, 21 Dec 2005, and even
>the newsgroup in which i read this, misc.writing. There. You happy?
>
>> Now do you have the balls to
>> apologise for dishonestly disregarding the context?
>
>You haven't the balls to admit dishonestly creating a dishonest
>context.
I feel like I'm inside a tornado now. Need more coffee.
--
Ray
.
- References:
- Re: Innocent!
- From: Ray Haddad
- Re: Innocent!
- From: Dr Zen
- Re: Innocent!
- From: Ray Haddad
- Re: Innocent!
- From: chris_tine49@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Innocent!
- From: Ray Haddad
- Re: Innocent!
- From: Dr Zen
- Re: Innocent!
- From: gekko
- Re: Innocent!
- From: Ray Haddad
- Re: Innocent!
- From: Dr Zen
- Re: Innocent!
- From: gekko
- Re: Innocent!
- Prev by Date: Re: Speaking of stalkers.
- Next by Date: [ZEN] Apply Occam's Razor
- Previous by thread: Re: Innocent!
- Next by thread: Re: Innocent!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading