Re: It's Deja Flu All Over Again

For some inexplicable reasons, Wendy Chatley Green
<invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

:For some inexplicable reasons, Josh Hill <usereplyto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
::It will become less virulent with transmission. But that happened in
::the 1918 pandemic too, and it still killed between 20 and 200 million
::people.
:
: Y'know, the gap between your cited numbers is 180 million.
:Can't you do better?

60 seconds' research answered my question.* An estimated 200
million may have been infected worldwide. Obviously, not all of them
died.


* the question being "What 200 million?" and not "Can Josh do better
research?"

--
Wendy Chatley Green
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Its Deja Flu All Over Again
    ... >:It will become less virulent with transmission. ... The pandemic was worldwide and took place during a world war. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Its Deja Flu All Over Again
    ... Josh Hill goes: ... >It will become less virulent with transmission. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Its Deja Flu All Over Again
    ... > For some inexplicable reasons, ... >::It will become less virulent with transmission. ... the gap between your cited numbers is 180 million. ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Its Deja Flu All Over Again
    ... >> It will become less virulent with transmission. ... most of the world presumably lacked infectious disease reporting. ... it seems that the median life expectancy in the US dropped by ten ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Its Deja Flu All Over Again
    ... Alan Hope wrote: ... > Josh Hill goes: ... >>It will become less virulent with transmission. ...
    (misc.writing)