Re: A nice joke I got (Chris.tine read)


"Steve Pritchard" <Steve_Pritchard@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3pbeckF9i31dU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Ray Haddad" <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:iceui1df1gg5d1co4fg87jgkpp72070ld0@xxxxxxxxxx
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:08:41 +0100, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> > and "Steve Pritchard" <Steve_Pritchard@xxxxxxxxxxxx> instead
> > replied:
> >
> >>"Ray Haddad" <rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>news:ioiqi1hlbgti900rsimnm603k9gogaviu5@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Oh, for goodness sake, Steve. Did anyone force you to enter into
> >>> this thread and make a fool of yourself? I certainly didn't and yet
> >>> you entered and now attempt to blame it on me.
> >>
> >>No one's blaming anyone. Someone's just pointing out that you are
> >>crashingly dull and repeatedly demonstrate your inability to hold a
> >>tenable position in any argument.
> >
> > Yet you find my posts irresistible. How can this square with your
> > assertion? Fact is, it doesn't. You seem unable to simply ignore
> > this "crashingly dull" series of posts. In fact, you came from the
> > woodwork to leap in of your own free will.
>
> One post, Ray. One from about 300. If that turns out to be
> "irresistible" in your book, then so be it.
>
> >>See what I mean? Your suggestion that you do this to "catch" people
> >>fools no one. You're an idiot. People are free to point at out
> >>without
> >>being "caught".
> >
> > Steve, it didn't start out that way but it has evolved into you
> > claiming I'm not worthy of you reading these posts while answering
> > them at the same time. If that's not a hook in your quivering lower
> > lip then I don't know what is. If you can't figure that out, how do
> > you manage to feed yourself every day? Does the can opener concept
> > have you baffled? Do you stare at the refrigerator wondering if the
> > light really went off when you shut the door?
>
> You're hilarious, Ray. Don't let anyone ever tell you different.
>
> > To make this clear to you, Steve, I began toying with you after you
> > entered the thread. I was really surprised that you had risen to the
> > occasion. Once you did, I found you to be a bit of sport - sort of
> > like those ducks that go in an endless stream across the target area
> > of a shooting gallery. You know, those mindless black silhouettes
> > that keep coming even after you shoot at them.
>
> It's frightening you know, the view you have of yourself. Astonishing
> and frightening.
>

Steve, if you want to get to Ray, insult him by implying that he uses fake
rabbits in his act. I happen to know that "fake rabbits in the hat" is
really a put down.

Also you can claim that he marks his cards. That's a hard accusation to
defend against, since it's true.

--The Observer


.