Re: REMINDER: No speaking to the troll)

Scott you were the very first poster on this newsgroup to cause me problems
and right now you are the very last poster to continue all the ***.

I can easily take snippets of the post before and after your "Thread
Hijacking" post on September 12, 2003 and prove that to you also.

BTW if I really were a "Stalker" I could not have won that jury trial 12 to
0 you ***. I was just trying to answer Cheryl's questions so BFD.

**********

Scott, you have to quit making "Hate Groups" on this newsgroup. That is
what makes you a Troll and the sooner posters here figure that out the
better for this whole place.

FYI, I got what I wanted. With the help of bbelly, ~Tony~ and Skateboard'n
I was finally able to classify what happened the day that RT started calling
me a "liar." And can you believe it? It was because I posted the correct
answer! Yes, it has all been that stupid thanks to you.

I had everything before June 18, 2004 classified, but that particular date
was one of the two key dates to all the *** about my CDL and I needed help
on it and I got help 3 1/2 years later. See: http://MTT.SlimeFest.com

Even if Tim/RT were to try and keep giving me *** I'd throw what he did to
me on June 18, 2004 right back into his face. As a matter of fact, I've
already done that a few times.

As for you, after the *** you posted today, I plan to show exactly what way
this newsgroup went after you hijacked my thread about when I got my CDL.

Oh, and don't forget, Zeke reposted that exact post you Hijacked and without
your Thread Hijacking two posters gave me very decent replies. So that
helps me with my case against you.

Once more Scott. Please quit your holier than thou attitude. It hasn't
helped this newsgroup before why do you think it will help now?
http://Scott.on.JusticeGoneWild.com

Rocky


"tscottme" <blahblah@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7IadnVf4LtSJHxHanZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm preaching not to engage the stalker and I don't engage the stalker.
I'm suggesting that someone with difficulty breaking away from full-time
arguing with the stalker not let themself get drawn back in by pretending
that their argument is just setting the record straight or whatever other
common excuse for arguing with the stalker some of the groupies often
make. I haven't replied to any post from the stalker in years except if
I've mistaken one of his infinite number of screen names for a human
being. When I recognize a stalker screen name it's just killfiled and
nothing more. How about you, many many days has it been since you've given
him what he wants?

--

Scott

Growing corn to make ethanol to fuel a car is like heating your house by
burning money in your fireplace. Yes, it can be done but it makes no
economic sense.
"Top" <topretired@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:478aa109$0$10970$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"tscottme" <blahblah@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:rf2dnYmiuJnEpRTanZ2dnUVZ_oaonZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:

-So you are responding to the person you are thanking others for not
responding to? Don't respond to him, don't argue with him, don't send
him messages through replies to others. Just say no to him. Don't
explain why you diagnose him, don't replay the whole disgraceful past
in here to the next bogus screen name claming to be a newbie. Just
don't do it, no exceptions. I guarantee if you start with one
exception you will allow yourself to be drawn in and before you know
it it will become your full-time job like the groupies. The only
thing he wants from anyone in his life as any kind of response, a
cruel response is just as rewarding to him as a kind response. If
anyone really does want to punish the one who shall not be named the
only punishment that punishes is to ignore him. He's not normal, no
amount of abuse will cause him to re-evaluate his life, any
interaction is defined as a reward. Just don't do it.


How about do what you preach and don't talk about him or the the past.
I,m
not the best at ignoring it but I don't preach either.

Top




.