Re: Best companies to work for
- From: "Gashauler" <swordfish2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:08:21 -0500
"Mike T." <noway@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45815900$0$97233$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You'd be surprised how close that statement is. There's always someone
Well that's actually a good thing, I think. If it was easy, everybody
would be doing it, there would be no jobs available and the pay would be
shit. :) -Dave
that's willing to take you job and for lower pay. The problem is there's
just about the same going out as coming in but each cycle the benefits get
less as does the pay.
.
- References:
- Best companies to work for
- From: Mike T.
- Re: Best companies to work for
- From: gpsman
- Re: Best companies to work for
- From: Mike T.
- Best companies to work for
- Prev by Date: Re: Best companies to work for
- Next by Date: Legal/disqualification question?
- Previous by thread: Re: Best companies to work for
- Next by thread: Re: Best companies to work for
- Index(es):