Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:26:10 -0500
"gringo" <gringo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:o36Hg.4945$T8.70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dennis (Icarus) wrote:person
"gringo" <gringo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:krMGg.270$y7.170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dennis (Icarus) wrote:
"gringo" <gringo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5PvGg.40406$Uq1.30659@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dennis (Icarus) wrote:
"gringo" <gringo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0VtGg.32088$bo6.15071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dennis (Icarus) wrote:
"gringo" <gringo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:XlnGg.30473$qd.4811@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dennis (Icarus) wrote:
"gringo" <gringo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oncGg.22380$0k4.3446@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dennis (Icarus) wrote:
"gringo" <gringo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nX9Gg.30090$Nx4.12817@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snip>
So any of the other "handlers" been charged?
No?
of course not. The blame always is laid on the lowest denominator.
Look up the statutes on criminal conspiracy.
If they guards thought they were obeying orders they thought were legal,
alid orders, then that would be a mitigating circumstance, and the
giving the orders would also be charged.
you are speaking logically. Proof in a legal sense is not based on logic.
They must prove that they were given such orders. Since it was done
verbally, one-on-one essentially, there is none.
Yes, I am using logic. And this is why one requests orders one thinks to be
suspect, IN WRITING.
Surely you're aware of such things, having served in the military, right?
seizure,
despite Constitutional protections against warrantless search andGetting closer all the time, Dennis. Isn't it? If Bush wasn'tNo, its not. That you thnk so is pretty surprising to me.
Americansit is done all the time now. Wiretapping of all calls, foreign and
domestic. Emails read, internet activities monitored. Cameras either
hidden or in the open, watching everything we do. Thousands of people
(including American citizens) being held without being charged.
Britsengaging in torture! Big Brother is alive and growing stronger.
Pretty much what the Brits do now? And folks have been praising the
intelligencefor their uncovering of that terrorist plot.
:-)
Sure. We've discussed this vast conspiracy of the imbecilic kind. No
proof that those fools were doing anything more than talking. Not saying
they would not have eventually acted--but British and American
secret agents broke their pledges to provide money and logistics
supports--hell, they wouldn't even buy them any uniforms!
And there was no proof that Atta wouldve done
anything...until...he...and...his...cohorts....did.
If
involved in 9/11, at the very least he was aware of it in advance.
elsewhere.the military had been permitted to follow normal procedures thatHow so? :-)
morning, the attacks would have been prevented.
One word: Cheney.
Sorry, you need more words than that.
it's available for those who seek the truth. And I have provided it
As I said......
his
wow. I typed jew instead of communist. Doesn't change the results.Check this out:Try communists.
http://www.911dossier.co.uk/pen10.html
9/11 is the equivalent of the Brown Shirt's burning of the Reichstag,
which was blamed on the Jews. It scared the hell out of the German
people; it became Hitler's excuse to implement:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire
Hitler used Germany's very own "terrorist attack" to instill fear in
right?people, and to gather the reins of limitless power.
You are aware that bin Laden has claimed credit for the Twin Towers,
Or is Al Jazeera now part of the vast right-wing propaganda machine too?
Just what does that have to do with Hitler's similar tactics? Except for
Quite a bit.
these glaring facts: Bin Laden family and the Bush family are partners in
several businesses; Daddy Bush under the aegis of Ronnie Reagan
supplied--and trained-- Bin Laden and Al Qaeda in his fight against the
russians; Dubya Bush allowed two planeloads of Bin Laden's siblings (and
Osama himself??) to leave America after the attacks without being
questioned by even a Boy Scout.
In the 1980s, they were opposing the Soviets after their invasion of
Afghanistan.
Ahh..but of course thats ok.
the
Think about it: *what info could they have gotten from Osama's siblings if
they had been sent down to Gitmo for a few months??* Torture is a fine,
honorable tactic to be used against the peons, but don't harm a hair on
head of one of bush's friends!
Thought you didn't like what was going on at Gitmo?
<snip>
chaps
And had we uncovered the plot on 9/10, there is no doubt in my mind that
you'd be castigatingt he Bush admin for arresting those 19 peaceful
likewise.who "hadn't done anything".
We've been polite with one another so far. Merely debating an issue. Keep
it that way? Don't make any references to me personally, I'll do
Just speculating on what you'd say, based on what I've read so far.
Would not have been any diffeent, from what I can tell, than your reaction
to the Miami plot or what occurred in Britian.
Again, speculative.
<snip>
been
I've read the same thing at several sites. No chemicals could have
themixed onboard in enough quantity to do much harm. And if they feared
:-)stuff carried on in luggage, why then did they give away--unopened and
untested--thousands of bottles of confiscated liquids to charities?
Feel free to list the sites. Please exclude dailykoz or its affiliates
Dennis
You haven't read what I've already posted, Dennis. Read, make comments,
I'll make counter-points.
I thought thats what we've been doing.
Dennis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Popeye
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: tscottme
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Popeye
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Gashauler
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Popeye
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Gashauler
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: Dennis \(Icarus\)
- Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- From: gringo
- OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- Prev by Date: Re: Democrats on a roll...
- Next by Date: Re: Bad bad deal!
- Previous by thread: Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- Next by thread: Re: OT -- On the implausibility of the explosives plot
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading