Re: No need to respond


"tscottme" <blahblah@blah,net> wrote in message
news:qoydnaYolOrrsqvZRVn-og@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"gashauler" <swordfish2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cu2dnRwB38EOPajZnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


<snip>
This is so hypocritical of you because of what you have called me.
<snip>


The most painful thing you could do to him is block him and ignore him.
Don't you want to inflict pain on him? Nobody reads his messages except
to
the extent needed to recognize another nymshift. If he acused you of
leaving footprints on the beach nobody would believe him. I'm not sure
why
you tie yourself in knots over the rantings of a mentally ill person.
Because nearly every other single participant in the NG isn't responding
to
him and you are, you are the focus of all of his diseased fury. But your
name or the specific accusations against you are not the cause for
anything,
they are just the point whereby the stalker displays his illness. If you
had been ignoring him all this while, he would be making accusations
against whoever it was that was responding to him. He would use different
accusations but they would be figments of a diseased mind not the
consequence of anything in particular. Your serious replies to him are
the
most exhillirating part of his life. Wouldn't it be satisfying to
withdraw
the most valuable thing from him that you can?

Watching you and him is like watching an astronomer work himself to death
arguing with a flat-earth kook. Mental illness isn't curable by argument.
If his disease was paranoia, every sentence he read would *prove* that the
CIA and the International Jewish Conspiracy are active against him. If
you
were arguing for the plain meaning of those sentences he would argue you
are
an agent of the conspiracy. If his disease was OCD, every sentence would
remind him there are bugs crawling on his skin and it's been 3 minutes
since
he last washed his hands. He would claim you are causing those invisible
bugs to contaminate him.

Stalkers behave due to their illness. It's not possible to conclusively
show them they are not wanted. Because you have a normal mind it seems
impossible that you would want to be where you aren't wanted. Because you
have a normal mind you would recognize even subtle signs of that signal,
let
alone big obvious signs. But this is impossible for the diseased mind.
Anorexics will *know* they are positively huge even as they die from
starvation, it's not a matter of telling one anorexic their actual weight
or
the seriousness of their condition. I've heard an anorexic in the process
of starving claim if they can just drop from their bloated 85 pounds to
70-75 pounds they would feel slim for once. Of course they said the same
thing about 120, 115, 110... until they arrived at their target, at which
point the target shifted lower. You are essentaily arguing whether 100
pounds is an unhealthy weight. Even if you could convince him of your
point, and it's not possible for anyone to convince him with any amount of
proof, his target will change. If you stop, the target will change to
another person. If you focus on another lie of his, his focus will change
to that. He may argue like each of these points is a matter of life and
death, they aren't. These points are simply the bait that has given him a
fish to struggle with. He has no other contact so he works harder at it
than anyone else. What is a matter of life and death is that someone
respond to him with real interest, even if that interest is a passionate
threat. If you were starving, even rotten fruit would be seen as a
godsend.
Others would wretch over the smell of it, the starving man would down the
fruit and be graetful for every grisly bit.

--
Scott



Why do you continue to call names when that is the SHIT that has helped turn
this newsgroup into a SHIT STORM?

You might want to look at what was posted earlier.

As for the names tscottme calls me. What an IDIOT he is. He calls me a
"stalker" and for what? Because a mother wrote my attorney a letter telling
him she didn't want me to send her daughter any more "letters." Those
"letters" were in reality ANSWERS to Cheryl's questions.

Cheryl and I could talk with NO problems whatsoever. As a matter of fact,
the worst part was, trying to get off the phone once we started talking.
But, her mother and step-dad would go ballistic when I call her. Instead of
trying to call back to answer a question she had asked me, I'd write her a
letter instead. BFD

In court, everything on the prosecutors table was my exhibit, everything.
If I'd wanted to, I could have really showed what an ass her mother has been
all these years and I probably would have, if her mother hadn't been caught
telling a "big" lie on the witness stand.

http://slimefest.com/Exhibits

or

http://mtt.JusticeGoneWild.com

Rocky


.

Relevant Pages