Re: This month's numbers


"realitytrucker" <timp1232@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138638375.610286.309210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Rocky wrote:
>> "Top" <Top@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:Xns975A6E7C0AA3ATopneorrcom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > group : misc.transport.trucking
>> > Computing time :12:00:00 AM
>> > Stats : from 1/1/2006 to 1/30/2006
>> >
>> > ***** Best contributors / quantity *****
>> > 37 : amykae
>> > 31 : Dave Smith
>> > 27 : Roughrider50
>> > 26 : Whitelightning
>> <while the rest is snipped, some people can just click on the "news:";
>> line
>> above and see the original post.>
>> <For others, they might have to view this post in google to have the link
>> above work>
>>
>>
>> COOL!
>>
>> That is MUCH MUCH MUCH better and believe it or not, I think your posting
>> "number" have helped put an end to some of the flame warriors on this NG.
>> It was like they did a double take on why they post so much.
>
> Don't think so...you're still here

I think your mom is calling you.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: This months numbers
    ... Rocky wrote: ... > above and see the original post.> ... they might have to view this post in google to have the link ... Prev by Date: ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)
  • Re: re:Question about charger circuit
    ... >how to read the schematic in the original post of this thread? ... I see you posted at Google this time. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.electronics.misc)
  • Re: Cleaning fluids
    ... > Original post here... ... > google and follow them there. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.models.engineering)
  • Re: Cleaning fluids
    ... > Original post here... ... It's people using Google Groups failing to realise ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.models.engineering)
  • Re: Google Secure Access
    ... So no apology for your accusation that he was lying? ... Oh for Gods sake, its an FAQ. ... I don't think that was claimed by the original post. ... traffic via google. ...
    (sci.crypt)