Re: 1 Down, 3 To Go

thunder wrote:

> But the thing they were really trying to nail him for was the outing of
> supposed highly CIA agent,and all they could get him for legally was lying
> to the FBI. Some court TV guy I was watching said the if it really was about
> national security or really top secrets being divulged they would have
> nailed this guy on real serious charges instead of perjury and covering
> up.Basically if he didn't lie to the FBI they would not been able to indict
> him on anything. Reminds me of Clinton. If he didn't lie about Monica they
> couldn't have gone after him.. As usual just political tit for tat.

Hell, they lied about so many things in order to start that dirty little war,
why would anyone expect them to admit to having exposed a CIA agent. You really
have to wonder about an administration that would stoop so low as to expose one
of their own agents in an attempt to discredit the agent's husband.

.