Re: Doug & Scott


"gashauler" <swordfish2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VcGdnaTX8tGexfzenZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Top" <Top@ bitme.neo.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:uB98f.4604$ZV3.381086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> You received my email? Gave you the name but no SSN. I dealt with
>> idenity theft before. Don't intend to go through that again. I will trust
>> you to a degree but I won't go beyond what can be easily found on the
>> internet. Hopefully you will post when you find out I am who I say I am.
>> Verify I am not a weekend warrior? No ofense to National Guard or the
>> reserve is intended.
>>
>> Top
>>
>>
>
> I don't understand Top. Why do you have to prove to anyone your time in
> the service? It's doesn't go to creditability.

Actually, he based his credibility upon that.

So now he should establish that point.

As should you, since you referenced -your- career.

Like you, however, once that point is established, it won't make his
argument any more credible.

Yours is a joke.

I still don't have your name and address, tough guy.

Might as well toss in that "I'm in your face" phone number, too.

And remember, while you're getting your ass kicked, you're the one that
jumped in here with a vitriolic anonymous argument, attacking me.

>And besides if you want proof you can post you ID card with all the
>sensitive info blocked out. You have to do the time for the ID to read
>retired.

Sounds good to me.



>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Doug & Scott
    ... I dealt with idenity ... > theft before. ... Don't intend to go through that again. ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)
  • Re: Doug & Scott
    ... idenity theft before. ... Don't intend to go through that again. ... I will trust you to a degree but I won't go beyond what can be easily found on the internet. ... And besides if you want proof you can post you ID card with all the sensitive info blocked out. ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)