Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming

TurboTrucker wrote:

> "Rock Salt" <drrocksalt@xxxxxxx> wrote in
> yp%6f.510438$xm3.93725@attbi_s21:">news:yp%6f.510438$xm3.93725@attbi_s21:
>
> > You are clueless. I have documented every improvement made at Swift
> > and now even the Feds agree with the highest safety rating being
> > awarded to Swift, yet you think I am brainwashed?
>
> If you weren't, you sure are now.
>
> The "satisfactory" rating is, and always has been a joke. All it means is
> that they are now in compliance with the minimum amount of safety
> management criteria that the FMCSA requires to hold that status, and
> nothing more.

Yep. And flaunting the "highest rating awarded" just means that they meet the
minimum requirements. Swift's publicity on that new rating conveniently
omits the fact that they had to go to court over their previous conditional
rating.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: New Safety Rating
    ... > Safety agency assigns highest rating to Swift Transportation ... is a truckload carrier headquartered in Phoenix. ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)
  • Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
    ... > even the Feds agree with the highest safety rating being awarded to Swift, ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)
  • Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
    ... somebody at Swift made some campaign contributions. ... > highest satety rating. ... pretty bad situation for a major carrier. ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)