Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
- From: TurboTrucker <alprova(NS)@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:26:56 -0500
"Rock Salt" <drrocksalt@xxxxxxx> wrote in
yp%6f.510438$xm3.93725@attbi_s21:">news:yp%6f.510438$xm3.93725@attbi_s21:
> You are clueless. I have documented every improvement made at Swift
> and now even the Feds agree with the highest safety rating being
> awarded to Swift, yet you think I am brainwashed?
If you weren't, you sure are now.
The "satisfactory" rating is, and always has been a joke. All it means is
that they are now in compliance with the minimum amount of safety
management criteria that the FMCSA requires to hold that status, and
nothing more.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
- From: Dave Smith
- Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
- References:
- Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
- From: Rock Salt
- Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
- Prev by Date: Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
- Next by Date: Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
- Previous by thread: Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
- Next by thread: Re: In Regards to Swift Slamming
- Index(es):