Reply to Tim 9-30-05


realitytrucker wrote in message
<1128131665.915545.7420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
>Dave and others, myself included, call you a wannabe yet it had nothing
>to do with whether or not you hold a CDL or drive a truck. It does,
>however have to do with professionalism and you are NO professional.

Oh, because I post on the internet? How lame is that for judging others?



>No. No scans. All you have to do is scan a pic and article to your
>computer, make a few changes, such as replacing the original driver's
>name with your own and voila! You have manufactured your proof. If
>it is a legitimate publication it'll have a website. Post the URL.

While their internet site has most all of the story, the photo they use on
the internet, does not match the one they used in the paper. The scan has
the better photo of my truck. I use the scan for a link to the one on their
website.

I tried to get all the photos taken for the paper, but I only ended up
getting two of them. Too bad they were not the two they used.


>> Rocky - Barry has proven me right before
>
>How? I don't recall Barry ever proving ANYTHING about you except that
>you like to annoy people via unsolicited email as well as in a
>newsgroup.

He found out who I drove for or did you forget?



>I won't hold my breath, ROcky. You've proven in the past that you are
>a liar anf a fraud and you'll do it again. All anyone has to do is
>google your name or names and the archived posts will pop up. Thanks
>to Google and the internet, which you obviously are so fond of, we've
>got all the proof of claims we made about you. It's now time for you
>to prove something.

You have forgotten about Barry proving Dave wrong and why Dave no longer
uses the phrase "Wanna be truck driver?" You are a lost cause and you will
always be. As much as I wanted to send you that URL, I guess I can forget
about that.


timp1232@xxxxxxx killfiled on AT&T

Rocky - Say hello to topper for me -


.

Loading