Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: "Usually Silent" <Eat@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:42:48 -0600
"Free Lunch" <lunch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ouhgl613ecmr3lp6bs46q6aosgd149n04d@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:08:03 -0600, "Usually Silent" <Eat@xxxxxxxx>
wrote in misc.transport.road:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:k7mel6th0k9oed16jia2v14gg238mr6s6l@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:11:03 -0600, "Usually Silent" <Eat@xxxxxxxx>
wrote in misc.transport.road:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:teodl6hbk6bot2a0oaj6f785j5dji1mf4i@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:35:47 -0600, "Usually Silent" <Eat@xxxxxxxx>
wrote in misc.transport.road:
It depends. Are the parents trying to impair the quality of the
"Free Lunch" <lunch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:i7mdl6pkunnclmd3j6e5ijnb0f6p19rgn3@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:54:03 -0500, "George Conklin/Sociation Today"
<nilknocgeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in misc.transport.road:
We certainly have a lot of folks who appear to think that they could
"Sancho Panza" <otterpower@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4d56ac45$0$28579$607ed4bc@xxxxxxxxx
On 2/12/2011 9:16 AM, George Conklin/Sociation Today wrote:
And having elected officials give a citizen-supported
study back to hostile staff is an invitation to destroy it. It
is
a
pure
conflict of interest. Elected officials know that they are
frequently lied
to by their own staffs, so when they ignore the advice they are
given it
is not out of ignorance, but because they know the advice is
political, even
if it has an "engineering" stamp on it. Writing an article about
mortality
patterns is not doing medicine without a license. Writing about
traffic
patterns (by whatever label) is not practicing engineering
without
a
license. Predicing the future is not an engineering-only
undertaking.
Imagine if only educators were allowed to analyze and comment on
school
performance.
Maybe it should be -:)
do
better than teachers, even though they have never taught a class.
So parents shouldn't have input into the education of their child?
education of their child? If they are, their opinion should be
completely ignored. Schools should not avoid teaching facts that
children need to learn just because their parents want them to remain
ignorant about it.
Bullsh*t!!!!!!!!!!
If I want to teach my child the world is flat I should have that right.
Why?
Because if it is what I believe and I want my child to believe it that is
my
right as an American parent. Because schools should respect the right of
the parent to have the child educated with information consistent with
their
parental values and beliefs, not undermining them.
Why should they support the falsehoods that the parents teach? I agree
that parents generally have the right to teach anything they want to
their kids as long as it doesn't cause harm to the kids, but I don't
believe that the parents have the right to force schools to join with
them in their conspiracy against knowledge. False beliefs need to be
undermined. Ignorance needs to be destroyed.
Okay what about parents that don't believe in the Pledge of Allegience? Or
the Constitution? Or parents that believe their child should have the
opportunity for silent meditation (not prayer) during classes. What about
Muslim parents that believe their child should be allowed to pray to Mecca
if the school is run by athiests? Are they going to say the parents belief
is ignorant and should be wiped out and over ruled? Should those parents
beliefs be destroyed by the school and the government? Are you now going to
judge what is ignorant and what isn't? What gives schools and government
that ultimate authority?
Again I say BULLSH*T!!!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: rshersh@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- References:
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: George Conklin/Sociation Today
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: John Lansford
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: George Conklin/Sociation Today
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Sancho Panza
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: George Conklin/Sociation Today
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Usually Silent
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Usually Silent
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Usually Silent
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- Prev by Date: Re: spacing of interchanges on Federal interstate highways?
- Next by Date: Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- Previous by thread: Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- Next by thread: Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|