Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Larry Sheldon <lfsheldon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:33:11 -0600
On 2/9/2011 8:59 PM, Rich Piehl wrote:
On 2/9/2011 8:54 PM, US 71 wrote:"cpzilliacus"<cpz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3ae61e1d-1546-46d6-84b8-56da4918a9b1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=4494
The Rethuglicans are trying to silence free thinkers again, I see.
Strangely the article mentions no political parties. Amazing how you
reach that opinion with no evidence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverly_Perdue
I wonder who signs the "state engineer's" pay check.
--
Superfluity does not vitiate
California Civil Code quote-#3537
http://lwolt.wordpress.com/
http://tinyurl.com/269dspw # <-- Where I live
3
.
- References:
- N.C.: Have an Opinion? You’re Violating the Law!
- From: cpzilliacus
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: US 71
- Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- From: Rich Piehl
- N.C.: Have an Opinion? You’re Violating the Law!
- Prev by Date: Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- Next by Date: Re: Red light cameras reduce fatal crashes, study says
- Previous by thread: Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- Next by thread: Re: Have an Opinion? You're Violating the Law!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
