Re: Vetting
- From: Larry G <gross.larry@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 31, 3:58 pm, Rich Piehl
<rpiehl5REMOVETHIS...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Larry G wrote:
On Aug 31, 2:06 pm, Rich Piehl
" Different view of the same problem. I guess at that point it
becomes a
question of what they are trying to accomplish. If they are just
trying
to secure their power for self gratification you are right. If they
are
trying secure their power for a larger purpose I'm right."
WRONG!
how would you know... whether it is Obama or Bush or someone else -
their motives?
you don't but you assume unpure motives with some and others you
assume that they are good guys..
..when you have no clue other than your own prejudice and what you
choose to believe from the media of your liking...
you are not objective at all...
everything that Obama folks do wrong - is one more point against them
the same situation with Bush was ...apparently ... "not as bad".
Have you ever heard the expression: show me your friends and I'll show
you your future"? Obama's pastor for 20 years is a racist, his green
program adviser has a questionable background, his dealings with Tony
Rexko aren't clear, he is closely tied with ACORN who is under numerous
investigations for shady and illegal dealings in several states, his
treasury secretary couldn't do his own taxes, his vetting process for
several cabinet positions failed to weed out people cheating on their taxes.
You're right Larry. His record is impeccable.
once again you evade the issues and focus on pejorative attacks on
Obama ..
this shows your real agenda and it's basically the FAUX NEws agenda of
doing and saying anything and everything necessary to get rid of Obama
no matter what he accomplishes or not.,
I never said his record was impeccable. I said that on the whole his
good and bad things are no worse than previous flawed Presidencies but
you choose that as your excuse to oppose any/all of his policy
proposals...
that's not objective at all.
.
- References:
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: Rich
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: Larry G
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: Rich
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: roscoe yamamoto
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: Rich
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: Otto Yamamoto
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: Rich Piehl
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: Otto Yamamoto
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- From: Rich Piehl
- Re: OT: Paging Sen. McCarthy! Pls pick up the RED Courtesy 'phone!
- From: Otto Yamamoto
- Re: OT: Paging Sen. McCarthy! Pls pick up the RED Courtesy 'phone!
- From: Rich
- Re: OT: Paging Sen. McCarthy! Pls pick up the RED Courtesy 'phone!
- From: Otto Yamamoto
- Vetting
- From: Rich Piehl
- Re: Vetting
- From: Otto Yamamoto
- Re: Vetting
- From: Rich Piehl
- Re: Vetting
- From: Larry G
- Re: Vetting
- From: Rich Piehl
- Re: OT Health Care was Re: More Government Interference
- Prev by Date: Re: Vetting
- Next by Date: Re: Vetting
- Previous by thread: Re: Vetting
- Next by thread: Re: Vetting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading