Re: Good riddence to the Bushies, Idiot Repubs, and all the idiot christians...

On Dec 26, 5:32 pm, Adam Prince <aprinc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 26, 1:23 pm, "pigsty1...@xxxxxxxxx" <rshe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Dec 26, 10:07 am, Adam Prince <aprinc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 25, 11:56 am, "pigsty1...@xxxxxxxxx" <rshe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 24, 9:19 am, Adam Prince <aprinc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 23, 11:49 pm, "pigsty1...@xxxxxxxxx" <rshe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 23, 10:27 am, Adam Prince <aprinc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 23, 12:55 am, "pigsty1...@xxxxxxxxx" <rshe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 22, 10:46 pm, Adam Prince <aprinc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 22, 10:45 pm, "pigsty1...@xxxxxxxxx" <rshe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 22, 10:06 am, Adam Prince <aprinc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 21, 10:38 pm, "pigsty1...@xxxxxxxxx" <rshe....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am sure kozel is licking his chops over Obama's  billions for
infrastructure.

Randy, I heard the ICC is going to get money from Obama.

wouldn't suprise me a bit, so MdTA doesn't have to take surpluses from
its existing facilities.

You should go down and stop that from happening Randy.  Now's your
moment.

Naah, who was it O'malley that permitted the whole stupidity to
happen?
No it was Ehrlich, and O'malley continued it when he became Gov
too little too late now.

They are using the Robert Moses school of const.

Once it gets beyond a certain point, it is impossible to stop.

But Randy, you are dead certain it won't be built.  Why are you now
contradicting yourself?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

does not change my opinion one iota that it is a waste of money and
resources in a down economy

obviously it will be finished no matter what I think

whether the income from the ICC is insufficient to pay off the
billions borrowed or the MdTA has to take from the surplusses of its
other facilities, remains to be seen

and I-270 remains in the horrid condition it is in

you're still backtracking..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

my point remains, and you might see my post to Brian, there are many
more projects, that I consider much more needed than the ICC, that MD
should have put that money to.

If your point is that you keep changing the reason why you are against
it, then yes.  Other that that you are still backtracking.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

what changes and what backtracking???

Randy,

You've made plenty of changes on why you don't want it built, why you
say it won't be built, and now you are saying it will be built.  Seems
like you can't make up your mind on this one.

You've done nothing but make bold - and often unfounded - statements
about the ICC and then backtrack on this issue.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

yep Adam, it is obviously being built, and it will in all likelyhood
be finished.

I didn't think it would be, but MdTa plunged the surpluses from its
other facilities into it. I still don't want it built, but there it
is.

What unfounded statements?

do you think its traffic will provide sufficient revenue to meet its
costs?

I don't think so.

and I still think the money would have been better used to finish I-70
and I-270.

and that is not the first time I have said that.

you act like I am the only person opposed to it, you know full well
there was plenty of opposition, and lawsuits.
.

Relevant Pages