Re: hoover dam
- From: "Schrödinger's Cat Surprise! Jazz Band" <raashanrol@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:52:32 -0400
richard wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:49:41 -0700 (PDT), My Land of Misery
<grvan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 29, 1:09 pm, richard <i.do....@xxxxx> wrote:http://roadtrip08.1littleworld.com/hoover/hoover-01.jpgThe shot turned out nicely. It's obvious you didn't snag the photo,
Well here's one view of hoover dam you've never seen before unless
you've actually been there.
One photo? Nope.
My camera does panarama shots and stitches 3 photos together.
It shows the relationship of the new bridge to the dam itself.
or the tools, from our OSTT target.
I was surprised at how well it did turn out. I can't see where there
are any hints of a "stitch" as in some I've seen elsewhere.
I'm impressed. That's nifty and it's a good shot. Don't worry, I'm not trying to curry favour. That's an *honest* opinion. Do more *** like this.
--
Comrade Otto The Duke Of Yamamoto
http://mryamamoto.50megs.com
'The Quality goes in before the Name goes on'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hoover dam
- From: My Land of Misery
- Re: hoover dam
- References:
- hoover dam
- From: richard
- Re: hoover dam
- From: My Land of Misery
- Re: hoover dam
- From: richard
- hoover dam
- Prev by Date: Re: Well, enough negative ***
- Next by Date: Re: Charles Slater: A Liar and A Degenerate
- Previous by thread: Re: hoover dam
- Next by thread: Re: hoover dam
- Index(es):