Re: (WV) Corridor H (US 48) funding on par with past years

On Dec 4, 10:06 pm, "Sherman L. Cahal" <shermanca...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 4, 10:01 pm, Bruce Harper <vtweb...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article
<c0c23b46-40a3-497b-9c2a-e1776cad0...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Sherman L. Cahal" <shermanca...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You won't hear this from S.P. Cook...


This is actually correct. Cut and paste from the newspaper is not my
thing.

Have you not read or replied to S.P. Cook's continual rants against me
Bruce? Or are you applying your usual one-sided logic in this case?

No one has "ranted" againt you, son. You despiratly want things to be
true that simply are not. You seem to believe that if you just
repeat the press releases of those exposed by the devistating
Legislative Auditor's Report that it will make it "false". That, son,
is not "ranting". That is debate. And in this debate, we (pretty
much everybody else that posts on the topic) have the independent
facts and you have press releases.



A casual Google query reveals not-that-old posts regarding his
continual rants regarding Corridor H being dead, presuming that he was
basing that off of the inactivity on the Corridor H web-site.http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/search?group=misc....

The facts of Corridor H remain as they were. The clearance to
complete the road as a through route does not exist, and it will never
be completed as such. And, as a disjointed assortment of unconnected
roads, it serves little purpose beyond getting locals to the county
seat quicker.

I have no "attachment" to any roadway, however, it is always nice to
bring up facts to any discussion.

EVERY WORD of the Legislative Auditor's Report is a FACT. NOTHING in
the Turnpike's press releases are. Why can you not deal with the fact
that what you have been told is simply not true?

But, please, line by line, refute ANYTHING in the Report with a "fact"
not taken from the Turnpike office.

Still waiting.

SP Cook
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Canadian Stalinist and rat pack member Dan Christensens same tired old lies and evasions...
    ... the no resolution came to act on it. ... They are not and in no way in any writing the report was stated to not ... They rejected a resolution based the report's recommendations. ... I stay on the subject and show that you lie when you claim that if the UN does not act on some report that this immediately means the facts are not accepted as true. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • WHY THE TRUE FACTS MATTER
    ... WHY THE TRUE FACTS MATTER ... and the conflict management program the Johns Hopkins University ... has published a 15 page report entitled: ... and the whole truth surrounding the Western Sahara region conflict. ...
    (talk.politics.misc)
  • WHY THE TRUE FACTS MATTER
    ... WHY THE TRUE FACTS MATTER ... and the conflict management program the Johns Hopkins University ... has published a 15 page report entitled: ... and the whole truth surrounding the Western Sahara region conflict. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • WHY THE TRUE FACTS MATTER
    ... WHY THE TRUE FACTS MATTER ... and the conflict management program the Johns Hopkins University ... has published a 15 page report entitled: ... and the whole truth surrounding the Western Sahara region conflict. ...
    (soc.culture.french)
  • WHY THE TRUE FACTS MATTER
    ... WHY THE TRUE FACTS MATTER ... and the conflict management program the Johns Hopkins University ... has published a 15 page report entitled: ... and the whole truth surrounding the Western Sahara region conflict. ...
    (soc.rights.human)
Loading